Also, I’d like to add that I’m not exactly a 100% traditionalist. I’m a naturalist. I care about what works. The parts of traditionalism that work are great, but I won’t adopt the parts that don’t work just because “MUH EUROPEAN TRADITION”.
Though I respect many of the insights people in the past had on society, we now have even more information, and it is time we make new traditions based on it.
Domination is a male thing, women have no place dominating anything.
What would it even mean that women dominate in home and social sphere, and how do you separate that, especially the social sphere, from public relations and politics?
Men in general don’t mind responsibility if they have authority over what they are responsible for. Stressful, lol. Men are designed by nature to deal with such stress. Women are much more delicate, and in general shouldn’t be forced to deal with nature (politics, war, philosophy, truth) as it might hinder their ability to care for the child by destroying them emotionally. Ideally, women would never have to hear some of the mean truths I tell. They would have their own female spaces where they can talk about whatever things women talk about (supervised by men, of course, to prevent possible treason and conspiring).
It’s funny to me when women are called the empathetic sex when they have no empathy (UNDERSTANDING) of other people at all. They just project their own feelings into the other and presume that the other is feeling the same way she would be feeling if she were in their shoes. The problem with this is that it presumes equality - that the woman and the person the woman is projecting herself as, are the same or at least very similar. This can kind of work for women when it comes to understanding other women, less so when it comes to men. Such blind projection fails to account for the differences between the sexes and adjust the judgment based on them, which an accurate understanding would necessitate.
It’s like when a woman told me that she can’t understand how men can put so much effort into pretending to be macho/masculine. It is completely inconceivable to them that men and women are different, so they think that if for her, as a woman, acting like a man would be difficult, then it means that it must be so for men too. What men really want, after all, is to be just like women, it’s just this society that keeps brainwashing men into wanting to pretend they are masculine. This is how these retards actually think.
In reality, for men it comes naturally to act like men, and for women it comes naturally to act like women. For men it would be difficult and a pretense to act like women, and for women it would be difficult and a pretense to act like men.
Try to get a woman to understand this, though, I dare you. “muh equality”. Anyway, that’s for you thinking it’s difficult for men to deal with such stresses. It’s not like we have much of a choice anyway.
It would be nice if people were forced to bear the direct natural consequences of their actions, instead of distributing the costs of their actions to the entire society. It would be perfect, for example, if Muslim immigrants raped and killed only those men and women who voted to import them. That would be so fucking awesome. Among other things, cucks and liberals would be made slaves of the enemies or killed, feminists would be raped and/or put into burqas or killed. And WN who opposed all this degeneracy would not have to suffer it and would get their own white state which would eventually rise to be powerful enough to push back Muslims.
Ah, it would be so nice if everybody got what they deserved.