Either the discussion goes a man’s way or no way, I see. Now it’s left…to people who have ideas and a spine that isn’t crooked.
Women are more cowardly, many would rather fuck the crime boss than be one.
I can show you dozens of honest, hardworking guys who have trouble getting laid cause they’re broke or short, stocky and bald, show me a crime boss who has trouble getting laid or finding someone to have babies with.
I’m not saying all women have no scruples, some do, but we all know if John Gotti went on POF he’d have hundreds-thousands of women lining up to suck his dick.
Women do less of everything, they commit less crimes, they work less, they’re less willing to question authority for good or ill, they’re more likely to live unremarkable lives of mediocrity, but this doesn’t mean they’re ascetics/minimalists, naw they’re often just as hedonistic/materialistic or more, statistics I’ve look at suggest women spend nearly as much money as men, and more money on frivolous things, like clothes, cosmetics and jewelry, and in most cases it’s not even their money, where as men are more apt to make investment purchases like real estate the whole family can benefit from.
I don’t do drugs or encourage drug use, once in a blue moon I smoke weed socially but that’s it, and I discourage drug abuse.
We live in an age where relatively harmless drugs with loads of medicinal properties like marijuana are illegal (althou apparently they’re working on decriminalizing/legalizing it), where as highly unnatural and experimental pharmaceutics that’re often just as dangerous and addictive as street drugs aren’t, I don’t expect anyone to respect such hypocritical, self serving drug laws.
Fuck if you haven’t broken a couple of laws in your life than I got to question your capacity for independent thought, I mean come on.
We’re talking about drug dealing and prostitution (legal to give it away but not sell it), arguably victimless crimes so long as everything’s consensual, the word depravity here is highly subjective.
You called me untruthful and dishonest.
Now you shoot another pair of insults my way.
Have a discussion with someone else and leave me out of it, please.
Goodbye!
While I’m trying to discuss facts, figures, and real life/death dilemma’s, the men project their ego’s into “reality.” How can I consider their egos more relevant than the issues at hand? They have no problems with framing reality as they “want” it, rather than it actually is. 20-30 million women and children kept as slaves is not as important as the splash of the comment of John Gotti getting his dick sucked. One man owns all those millions of lives or a scant few. We got no problems because only 450 men kill a year in Canada, okay, if you say so.
http://www.women.gov.on.ca/owd/english/ending-violence/domestic_violence.shtml
So glad that the violence is only 450 weak men who murder.
Seems that women are better off with guys since there is more abuse in lesbian relationships. 
Phyllo,
No more whining or running away. I gave you the out you requested, but instead you now intrude where you did not want to be found. Your name was not mentioned, yet here you are…again. I know, I know…the female made you do it. Either you are honest and stay in this discussion or lie from the sidelines, please…pretty please.
Men do suffer from domestic violence, it does happen and that video was certainly one horrific example of such violence perpetrated by a woman that man loved, completely abominable. She deserves to be behind bars as she is. Men need to report these instances and I do think that women are becoming more aggressive, more lost.
However, many laws have been changed or enacted to protect women…and men and children from abuse and that is thanks to feminism.
There are a lot of domestic violence videos available on YouTube, it would take forever to watch all of what’s online and be way too depressing as well. It’s an epidemic that continues to ravage more women and children than men.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0cW7yNnVOU[/youtube]
Lesbians make up 5% of the population, men 45-50%. Nice glib try Phyllo. Keep the info coming though so I can make comments on it since you seem to have nothing to add.
I am aware of this type of gender enactment in the form of physicality made by the more butch type of females who exude more of a masculine persona. Also, many of these abusive relationship have ties to the military in forms of service by the perpetrators.
Who is not being held accountable? Men enjoy throwing this accountability term around, but show me the money of who is not being held accountable and how they are getting away with it. Are the girls who murder not being arrested and tried with stiff sentences on their horizons? Who has not been held accountable, the number of women in prison is increasing exponentially says the story, so who?
I have way more to say about the effects of our culture on women, but that will be later.
Men excel at whatever they do, whether it’s crime on the one hand, or their careers on the other.
Men are less likely to be supported by their spouse or the state.
They work harder, longer hours, and contribute more to the economy, many times over.
Nearly all our entrepreneurs are men, nearly every idea civilization ever had was a man’s.
Civilization and civility themselves, for better/worse, were men’s ideas.
Men take risks, for good/ill, women are risk adverse.
Even in traditionally feminine activities such as food and fashion, men surpass women.
All the top chefs and fashionistas are men…nearly all the top artists, musicians and writers for that matter.
The only thing women are better at than men is taking care of children and the weak, and even there, they could use some help.
Single moms don’t discipline children enough, especially boys, consequently more are turning to crime and gangs for their role models.
Most divorces are initiated by women, and not because men were being physically or sexually abusive.
For better/worse, the family is by and large being destroyed by women, but is it because men are so insufferable?
Not at all, I read lesbians are more likely to be significantly less happy with their partner than both heterosexual men and women, and gay men.
Divorce is more likely to be financially motivated, or by misandric, anti-family propaganda.
Again, men are our doctors, our firemen, our policeman and paramedics because women are risk adverse.
All too often passivity is equated with benevolence instead of with cowardice and hypocrisy.
For better/worse, men built the institutions and most of the laws giving us what rights and freedoms we have, the institutions we, hope, we can count on to compile the data the OP and so many of her ilk are now using against men.
As for violence, again:
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2%20…%2068-eng.htm
Men are more violent, but most of their violence is directed at other (violent) men, not women.
As for domestic violence:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_against_men
It’s probably a far more reciprocal affair than the OP would have you believe.
You can’t rape someone with a vagina, but I wonder how many women are abusing men, extorting men physically, mentally, emotionally and financially because men aren’t “initiating sex enough”, and making women “feel attractive”, like that poor man in that video I posted, which’s a more covert form of rape.
Women are notorious for being masters of psychological warfare, for being emotionally abusive and vindictive, so much of what women do is so subjective, so subtle, can’t be easily ascertained or measured.
As psychology advances we may gain keener insights into the kinds of depravity women have a penchant for.
According to the FBI, 90% of homicides were committed by men, however, 80% of homicides were committed against other men, albeit other violent men.
So at least men are killing other men, albeit in gang related circumstances, and not women and children.
Are women more benevolent…or more cowardly and hypocritical?
When you’re attacked by a wild animal, or a caught in an accident or natural disaster, common sense will tell you you’re more likely to be saved by a man than a woman, whether it was his job to save people, or whether he went way out of his way to save you.
So if we’re more likely to kill you, we’re more likely to save your life, too.
It’s too bad they don’t keep statistics on who’s more heroic, only who’s more villainous, or if they do, such statistics aren’t well known, perhaps because they don’t fit the feminist narrative.
To reiterate, men are more vital to the economy, not only do they make more money, even thou women spend nearly as much from what I’ve read, and often on more superfluous things, men take on most of the dirty, dangerous jobs women won’t.
They’ve built our civilization from the ground up and maintain it.
Men are our farmers and construction workers, our doctors and paramedics, our policemen, firemen, rescue workers and soldiers.
If women are so benevolent, why don’t they put themselves in harms way to save others?
Does testosterone = malevolence, or is it a tool, like any other, that gives men the capacity to deal with life/death situations for good/ill?
And so what’s the downside of estrogen, how might estrogen manifest in psychopathic and sociopathic women, or bipolar women?
Women are squeamish about blood, but are they squeamish about blood money?
In all seriousness, I think it’d be an interesting study, to see how quickly women will throw themselves at notorious capitalist crime bosses, rich gangsters and thugs over your average honest, hardworking schmo.
Most women don’t have the balls to put their lives in peril for good/ill, but many sure as hell will marry the prick that does.
Of course such a study would be considered outrageously sexist, but science shouldn’t shy away from research merely cause it’s controversial, offensive, isn’t sufficiently PC or politically expedient.
Science ought to be just about the facts, and some facts are moral, and might reflect badly on women.
Perhaps women are even far more amoral/immoral than men, more vain, shallow and materialistic, but at the same time, more cunning, more manipulative, all the while play the role of the victim.
The best kind of power is the kind you don’t even see, that makes you think and feel like you’re powerful, and so when things go awry, you’re more apt to blame yourself rather than the real culprit.
Women are more insidious, their capacity for abuse, and benevolence can’t be so easily be measured in dollars and cents, in lives saved or lost, and since psychology is still a burgeoning field relative to other sciences, and hitherto dominated by men, albeit many with a feminist agenda, it’ll probably take longer for it to uncover the full depths of women’s, depravity…if it ever does.
You could say women have yin power.
Yin power is dark and mysterious.
It’s the kind of power that redirects your own ineptitude against you.
The two faced kind, provokes you into making an ass of yourself, then shines a light on you for all to see
It’s very underappreciated and under respected, yin power.
Often it comes to you as the very antithesis of power, as meek and mild, seeking comfort and counsel.
Where as men build bombs and bullets, blah blah.
Women’s power is clandestine, from behind the throne.
It’s sort of a simple, and in a round about way, masculine culture that thinks like power has to be in your face in order for it to be real.
More women are lemmings thou.
Thy’re less likely to commit crimes, and thought crimes.
They seem less capable of exercising critical, independent thought (in addition to being less imaginative and innovative), which’s why they’re more likely to be religious.
Ms goody 2 shoes teachers pet.
Many women are like pharisees, they know all words/laws, but they don’t understand the music.
It’s time to transform the female who may seem to be a lemming. What she is capable of remains to be seen. Her strengths have yet to ascertained. Helping women help themselves is my goal.