I mean it just ruins the meat and turns it all grey on the inside. And for real, when you order well done, everyone on the wait staff, and all the cooks look down on you and think you’re low brow because no one with any sense does that to a fine cut of meat.
How else would you preserve inherent distinctions if not by drawing boundaries using castes?
When people who have different natural inclinations come in contact with each other, they end up suffocating each other. That’s why castes are a must.
Castes don’t force Einsteins to carry garbage. Unless they are grounded in fantasy rather than in reality. And certainly, if you don’t have castes at all, that’s what’s going to happen, you’re gonna have Einsteins carrying the garbage.
It’s a very very very stupid argument. Things are WORSE without castes NOT better.
Ah, you are an idiot and a jackass I see. At any rate, the distinctions aren’t inherent, most abilities are learned, and most people given similar circumstances will produce similar output. You are clinging to this dumbfuck idea that you are a special snowflake just because you are a white honky cracker.
Which is the ultimate irony, because only black people order a steak well done. Not being racist, just saying, ask anyone who works in a restaurant. Just like Mexicans always want pineapple on a pizza. It would be like viewing Mexicans as inferior, then ordering pineapple pizza. Hilarious.
Gotta love how you’re telling me that groups are non-violent while you’re posting pictures of animal meat (which had to be killed and prepared by a group). I love it when other people unwittingly make my case for me.
Keep telling me how groups are non-violent while eating raw, red, bloody meat that was torn from another living organism. I eat meat too, but I don’t try to bullshit others by pretending living organisms can be non-violent.
If you concede that an individual man can be violent, then you also concede that groups are violent, since they are made up of individual men.
If anything, groups tend to be more violent - they consume more resources, take up more space, and have more capacity for physical destruction. I explained all of this in my thread I linked.
You should get an lsat prep book and just keep doing the games section. It can really help you to see how logical arguments are formed, and how common fallacies can be embedded in simple groups of statements.
Like your reading comprehension is decent, and you can write in complete sentences, but you’re having a lot of trouble making what should be a relatively simple argument. I could do it for you, but I disagree with the argument so I’ll just keep doing my side.
Like you say, “one man can be, therefore all groups are”.
You see the problem there?
I was trying to talk to someone about necessity vs possibility the other day because they were asking for philosophy and they got pissy and ran off. But I told them, a lot of people have real trouble with that distinction. And here we are…