Earlier detection and prevention of full blown, untreated mental illness by way of offering healthier alternatives earlier in life. Many people with mental illness self-medicate with all sorts addictions to “stabilize” themselves, but once you live an unbalanced life for so long, do you even understand what moderation is any more?
I really can’t diagnose any pressing mental issue in you, Ierrellus…
I’m sure he understands moderation, Wendy darling…
(but moderation works only for some things like weed, i’d not go anywhere near tobacco even in a moderated way)…
Lose not hope. You may be old, but i think what has been wronged, can be repaired to a remarkable extent… now even the mainstreamers are accepting what some of us have been saying here…
Generally , it may be safe to say that most mentAl illnesses, have their roots in early development , and cognitive dissidents is at the root. Onset usually is at adolescence or the next stage-young adulthood because reality becomes manifest as an autonomy.
Very early childhood mentAl illness is the outcome of the insucessful resolution of basic trust
Not as a sole contributing factor, nope. You be wrong. Intense emotional issues simply exacerbate the genetic baseline’s deficiencies spotlighting those deficiencies earlier in perceptive children who do recognize the dishonest nature of adult interactions with them.<—in a nutshell.
So, as I was saying there:
Time for the “analysts” to explore nonlinear writings like mine, and drop their “statistical” “proofs” of recycled, uninspired, and frankly ludicrous theories… and their coffee/tobacco/alcohol…
(feel free to pick up a pure weed joint*, though)…
Wendy darling, what do they think of weed in Hades (I’ve been fascinated by Hades for a while)?
Importantly…
I’d love it if you all take this test …
And post your results…
I’m a “diplomat”, by the way…
I’m an exception here, most people who hang out in online forums are “analysts” addicted to debate for its own sake… i for one mostly dislike debating, i’m a serial monologuist who visits because I have something unique, important to say…
(Just noticed…
Your hands are tied, Wendy darling??)
All 16 types are likeable when you understand them and why they evolved so.
Even Analysts are likeable to me, though that requires a bit more effort from my side.
Though at times I feel more like “diplomat, Advocate” or “diplomat, Protagonist”…
but I could have written better lyrics… this makes him seem like too much of a tyrant! I love the concept of Ra… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra
in particular, see:
“I am the New World Order to come, I am the first* and the last**”
[RISING SUN or white SUN]
** [SETTING SUN or black SUN]
Well, of course, an Italian Triarii Elite (King of Heaven and Earth) will be expected to sing that…
But I like more the concept of supercharged-Ra, that is, THIRD SUN [SUN OF THE SKY], the first [Sia] and the last [Hu] being merely the 2 main pillars that support Ra…
The King of Heaven, Earth, and Hell…
That is the truest form of Ra… not just Emperor and demigod, but a God on earth, a consummated philosopher-king…
Your writing style…nice. You I get, but the analytical will bring their wrath upon you for your flagrant indulgences in light-heartedness light of their rigmarole of hard evidence.
Am I the only one to find that “unsettling?” Must be a guy thing.
I see a deja-vu happening all over again… please don’t hound and troll me like Turd did over this very same issue… in revenge for whatever he felt vengeful about.
Let me rephrase my question then… so why do you think I am not? and why do you care to comment on me (and nobody else) in the first place?