@ James - This is the last part of my response.
Response to James - Part 3
Just to refresh our memories I will add a couple of quotes from another/other post/s contained within this thread as well as a copy of one of your sentences:
“The challenge in the modern age is to control mood with fear while also trying to control hope with diversity. Too many people get very tired of the “run around” and find all efforts to inspire to be unworthy of true hope (no one and nothing to trust).”
Thank you James for responding to this request.
Your response:
I think we could turn the corruption around and use the idea of a “social mood” as a means to help us analyze the social mood as opposed to control it - what do you think?
I would have to say that the social mood is always going to be there just that it should not be controlled like the way it is these days - this is a sad event taking place and I see it has been taking place for many hundreds of years.
The current form of globalism is a terrible idea as you state. I am very interested in your concept of SAM Coops and I think this is a way for the larger group to have a built in immune system if that makes sense.
Agreed - the hypnotism you speak of would have to be one of the most disgusting examples of humanity I have ever contemplated.
Eventually we are going to have to remove usury from our social diet - some say lending has led to the improvement of peoples lives but what about the lives it has destroyed? - something akin to a greedy child who is happy to share her/his toy but it comes with conditions and if those conditions are not met then it becomes a case of “my toy - you are not allowed to play with it - give it back”. The high rates of interest are the most ridiculous part of it - this leads to unnecessarily acceleration of the small few being able to consume resources at an alarming rate at the detriment to our home - the earth - and what about the idea that “our home” is not just “our home” but that of the creatures that occupy the same space - should we not be respectful of the other creatures on the planet, I can think of a few religions that justify doing what ever we want with the planet and its creatures - again we have to be careful of simple mindedness - not that I want to start a holy war here - lol.
James please excuse the slight edit in the following quote:
It is still possible that this rigorous method you suggest is up for some refinement but I guess what you are saying here is that a solid base set is what is required to produce harmony and that is what I agree with one hundred percent. In saying this you are quite welcome as far as I am concerned to brutally debate this with me. I use brutally in this sense: in a direct way that does not attempt to disguise unpleasantness; For example: “she was unapologetic and brutally honest”; source Google.
OK - I love this - the first time I saw this piece of writing I thought to myself “this is really cool”. I see a lot of thought has been put into this from the smallest micro-particle up to the largest entity.
I am interest by what you mean by communication. Could you elaborate?
That is certainly the oldest contention. I am interested in discussing this at length - I will do this via PM but for everyone else we could elaborate on this topic as needed or requested.
A really good use of Internet resources I think.
I have already read some of this and I came up with a concept on how the network could be built - maybe one day you would be interested in taking a look. I really like the diagram that you provide and it was that diagram that inspired me to put aside the time to build the concept - unfortunately at this time my big computer has crashed and I have to recover the data to be able to show you.
What do you think of the ideas that I have posted regarding Confinement Levels? They are a means of studying how effective a society is performing.
I am still in the early stages of developing this philosophy and have not even begun to develop any mathematical tools but I still think it is worth of a comment of some sort.
The idea of this philosophy is not for a few people to control but rather uncover flaws and to let everyone know about them - like in the News and other information sources.
Anyway - I am very grateful for your response and I hope we can discuss the topic of SAM Coops in depth - even if we have to shift the discussion to PM I do not mind.
Response to James - End of Part 3