A doctor jancke, who works in the University of Ruhr, demonstrated the data compression of images entering through the eye into the neural network of the brain.
What happens here is interesting. One would think, that the instant images that are incoming would be processed as they enter the neural networks of the cortex. But what really happens, is, that the brain processes an earlier datum, with a newer version, and processes the difference. The impression is of the difference, between the two images, while retaining essential parts of those images, it ignores the redundant parts.
In a changing venue, the differential between the two images, are superimposed into one image, through an imaging process, which is rather complex, and beyond the scope into this forum. The compression of the imagges, creates a denser data-form , since two layers of reality are compressed into a single one, through a differentiation process.
The essential relevance here, is a study on perception, which literally highlights the compression of reality, creating a visual field, changed on account of the way the brain functions with respect to interpreting the signals it receives. Likewise compression of matter on very large scales, such as the equally contaversial 'Black Hole ’ effect, although perceived through a different quality of the eye, namely through astronomical tools, conceives the effects of compression, as it relates to fields surrounding it.
The black hole exhibits strange behavior around its periphery, namely the Schwartzchild Horizon, whereby it changes matter coming into contact with it. Not only does it effect matter, but light itself is changed by virtue of the immense forces generated by the singularity.
Compression in terms of personal energy fields, although of very negligible in terms of measured effect, is also evident in a photographic technique called Kirilian photography.
To see what all these types of compression have in common, is to see effects of compression, in case of the Ruhr study, a exclusion of redundancy in image interpretation, changes, figuratively the image, as it effects its interpretation. It is the difference of the images which the brain interprets, rather then any current singular image.
Just thought I’d add this bit of information, as it may in some form help to show the underlying functions of energy fields across various differentials.
As to how close any energy field can come to chatagorize them as personal, is a question that ,for example come through in comparing Kirilian images with the halos of Saints, which some say manifest from incredible sources of yet a different kind of energy.