Most of the above refers to scholastic philosophy, the last to alchemical consequences of the forum
preceding mine.
Scholasticism is of great interest, since it is the predecessor of real ontological deliberation, imbued
with pure transcendentalism, before the renaissance.
Given the view of the incredible denial of ontology, beginning with Kant, and the consequential method,
by which it’s method has come to a very doubtful
past-future, the conclusion doesn’t seem as far fetched at all.
To predicate Being before the Essence of its contextual ramifications,do to its post modern significations, does support the idea of a changing
soul, in the sense of a qualifying principle, not one,
where it is a question of numbers, vis, how large are the numbers in a set of souls, whether be counted in real or virtual numbers.
Let’s say, Wendy, we were to identify a personal characteristic by overwhelming like qualities as racial
profiles. Here, the soul may, because of like qualities
shared, may vastly outnumber those, which aren’t, could not differentiate a very large group in terms of other than most relevant characteristics.
The idea is, that the soul, considered in terms of quantifiable aggregates, may not singly be
separated singularly, since there are no two perfectly unique individuals in the world, other then notable ones, and even they have commonly shared characteristics.
Those who become singular induviduals, composed of
either the self deluding ones, the ones who are not so
different, will not find themselves in a unique sense of self regardless where they are or who they are, or who they think they are.
The truly evolved, or the truly unevolved, notable or not, are either absolutely complete, and good, or, the truly uninvolved and truly unique with opposite characteristics.
The truly evolved have no fear of becoming part of an
indistinguishable soul, and their evolution does not
fear a rebirth , or a lack of it, knowing that the souk, the spirit, is really wholly, one, or consisting of infinitely many.
On the other hand , the unenlightened’s relationship with non unique mass characteristics, always take the form of imposing control on them, with hidden motives.
This is why I fail to see, how a whole-ly, connection
with a partial manifestation can form an unholy
alliance, either in a transcendental, or an imminent sense.
A real participation based on fear of being different, creates a mistique that such separation is dangerous.
The mystique of participation, breaking bods is tantamount of loosing their sole.
The only real way to avoid chaos, is through a reintegration based on a mediated and tested patterns, seen in the protection of territory. Only through many trials and long passages of time can souls gain the liberating binding force which results in less protection of territory.
Until this is achieved, freedom from chaos can not come about.
The enlightened Buddhist proclaim that Satori may take millions of rebirths, or it may happen in only one.
One qualification is, to be able fearlessly to loose one’s self, with the thought of never ever having to re-incarnate.
This is why Jesus said, those who love their life will loose it, but Those who hate their life will gain Eternity.