I’ve seen the upside of down and the downside of up and everything between.
Who do you think you’re kidding?
People here want to be seen as good for having any type of something ness someone wants but doesn’t have and can’t get. And yes, it is inherently evil …
You have a brain this small (.)
And you’re trying to puff yourself up to most earthlings…
I more or less tend to side with ecmandu, but his logic is somewhat incoherent and undeveloped compared to mine.
In my ideal world, if someone was upper class, and someone else was a millionaire, I wouldn’t find this as an issue that needs fixing.
I view it more like a game, like a bit of competition helps fuel the game and make it function properly. But I find the glitches of the game, such as someone getting stuck on a wall, as hellish and unfair.
So for instance, if someone is stuck in total poverty, and never gets to have sex with anyone they desire, I view this a serious problem with the game that needs fixing. And that is why I tend to side with Ecmandu more or less.
I tend not to side with asexual Buddhist monks and moderns who pretend suffering and sexual frustration is not a real problem, and more with Ecmandu.
The problem with Ecmandu I have is that he seems to only focus on human souls and ignores the hell animals have to go through to feed human souls. This makes him logically incoherent.
This is why I am the adult and you are the child. You are a pathetic human on a pathetic world.
First of all, lions are evil, they pretty much force male homosexuality on the male lions and kill all lions who resist.
They are less hated because they are mostly unconscious of their evil, they just do it as instinct.
I already explained why female homosexuality is not evil. You are good at math, you should have noticed why by now. You should have noticed the obvious fact that females are only attracted to 1% of males, and that the female form is universally beautiful. Thus, the logical conclusion is that males should be converted to the female form, but retaining their male reproductive capacity (futas).
But you go on about sentient rocks and a bunch of other bs like a child. Sometimes I wonder if you are even trolling.
My goal is to change your DNA so you don’t get sick from vegetarianism (Not veganism, vegetarianism, you can’t even get that right.)
You don’t even address the fact that hundreds of animals have to live horrible lives just to save you from dying a horrible death.
Please provide even the slightest reasoning why you believe inanimate objects are sentient. Are pieces of litter sentient? What about plastic pieces of foam? Why not stop there? Why not say that every grain of sand is sentient and every rock and every planet, asteroid, and space dust in the entire universe, has awareness.
Emotions are not evidence that blankets have sentience.
If I have an emotion that I am going to win the lottery tonight, doesn’t mean I am actually going to win the lottery tonight.