If you’re really equal, then don’t ask for the law to be skewed in your favor when you start fights with people who outweigh you by 100lbs.
If a woman slaps me as hard as she can, should I be able to return that as hard as I can? Or am I morally obligated to restrain myself? If I am, why?
Women tend to believe that thier vaginas are the end all be all of the world. But only because most guys are awkward, undesirable, desperate and willing to support that belief in order to get laid. But we’re not all like that. I’m very picky, and I’m not attracted to most women. When they want it, and the man refuses, they go bat shit crazy.
I guess the answer is no.
You don’t say!! 
Sounds to me like you surround yourself with insecure and deeply troubled women.
It also sounds to me like you like to play mind games with such women.
If you stole something from a woman that is very dear to her, it would makes logical sense that she might want to break down your door. But if a woman intends to break down your door in order to rape you, then I would really have to question the mental constitution of such a woman. And you in turn, since you also choose to surround yourself with such women.
If a bitch misbehaves in your home, carry her out like this:
This is preferable to slapping because it displays your physical superiority without hurting her one bit, and also shows you have strength and constitution to carry her like that, and that you won’t take shit from her.
It’s a win win win situation. Whatever happens, you’ll thank me.
Also, notice that if you google images of man carrying a woman on his shoulder, all the women being carried are happy and smiling. They love it.
Mr Reasonable wrote:
From what you write you are in control of most situations involving women and are street smart enough to exercise self discipline when and where you deem it necessary and the choice to refuse is yours as you have stated.
However there is no self discipline involved in rape or assault and there is no choice by the victim.
This involves being forcibly restrained against their will and sometimes by a stranger.
There is nothing wrong in desiring a woman, admiring her, but that does not give the man permission to take her without her consent.
That is how a man becomes a rapist.
.
That would only work if your home overlooks the sea, right on the beach.
Otherwise, how would you get her from your home to the car to the sea?
That’s a happy, fun scene. It brings me back.
Looks like bride kidnapping, which is still practiced in Central Asia and some other parts of the world, though it’s more of a formalized ritual now that’s executed between families. I was watching one of the docs about it, recently. The family does all the choosing, neither bride nor groom have a final say so in the matter, actually, and it’s a whole-community affair. The bride’s family looks for a rich family for their daughter and the groom’s family wants to make sure the bride is pretty and well-behaved. And then they do this elaborate spectacle play out of it where the groom’s family “kidnaps” the bride and hides her, and then the bride’s family comes “to the rescue” and then both parties negotiate as to how much the groom’s family should pay to the bride’s family for her. But it’s done kind of backwards now. The bride’s family picks which groom’s family should abduct their daughter (basically, sell her off) and then they play out the thing out. I could only imagine what it must have been like back in the days.
The whole point of rape is that permission is never given.
Most rapists are forcibly restrained in realm of sexual frustration and hurt, against their will.
That’s great. So you can feel good about yourself while these “awkward, undesirable and desperate” guys commit suicide while dozens of women are knocking at your door trying to fuck you.
Either way, it doesn’t matter to me. Someone shouldn’t rot 6 months in jail for giving someone a black eye that only lasts for a day.
So if I’m a victim of a crime, then its my fault if the perpetrator is female? Because I used poor judgement in taking her out to dinner and shit? You’re kidding right?
Pretty sure you’re a sock puppet of the biggest dick head on earth, but this is an excellent post, and a valid point.
Someone search for “Caleb Brantley”. A woman struck him at a bar. He struck her back. She told the police up on questioning that she his him because he disrespected her. Witnesses on the scene confirmed she hit him first. They let him go. Then they found 2 people who say he was the aggressor later on, and are attempting to prosecute him now. He’s set to enter the NFL draft. So the bad publicity on its own has already cost him substantial financial gains. The woman said she hit him first. Should be be able to sue her for lost wages given that her assault upon him and his act of self defense will decrease his draft stock?
Why didn’t they arrest her the minute she admiited to her crime? Why did they continue investigating him in spite of the woman’s confession that she was the one who assaulted him?
Isn’t the verbal attack the assault and the physical attack the battery? Sounded like he assaulted her first. What did he say to her?
If you’re right, then they should both be arrested. Right?
Also, the assault/battery distinction is only in some jurisdictions. And I think everyone should agree that hurting someone’s feelings isn’t equivalent to hitting them.