Indeed it would be without measure. Existence itself is not like that though. This is why most ancients considered a spiritual origin and that material existence comes after that, and is an illusion ~ because what is one is not multiple amd what is multiple is divided and not whole.
Interesting. comparison would then perhaps manifest existence. Makes sense.
Kind of like when you contrast things in your mind it highlights them, makes one distinct from another.
Yes, we could say with respect to your outlined idea above, that the blender is the act of comparison, contrast, an observer observing an observer who exists because an observer is observing another element in the comparative/contrast.
Perhaps if you do that once it then explodes as a myriad of iterations of that process and you get universe.
There has to be the faculty or property of observing, which itself requires an act of duality. One of splitting the oneness in two such to gain the given perspective needed to observe.
Well, as above, but yes there has to be a duality to begin with. Thinking about this I can only conceive that reality itself at its most fundamental, is observation. This would explain why existence and eternal repetition of universe. if something is ‘looking’, then by default it has to be looking at something. Then it just so happens that everything is there to be looked at.
So in a way we have to reverse the whole blender thing, then imagine that everything is already blended, then that the observer makes a contrast simply by virtue of being an observer, and things then begin to exist [get observed].
Thereafter is relativity and qm, an act of observing itself changes that which it observes.
Can you imagine if the whole of existence is a misperception. The observer looks at nothing, sees something, and then something else exists lol
_