You have an envy problem, which to me, only points to your own insecurities and further supports my assessment of you. The problem is not in me, Ecmandu, it’s in your own hollowness. You can call me clueless or whatever you want from now on if you like, if that would help you with my ‘female entitlement’ status, which seems to be bothering you so much for some reason. And it’s true, I admit, half the time I have to fucking clue what you’re talking about, it’s like you’re living in a completely inverted world. Maybe you’re just that much better than me intellectually (without all the ego, of course, right?).
You say what ever you do in this world you will end up hurting someone. But you do not make any distinction between intentional and unintentional
hurt. And you do not say that those who are being hurt will be hurting on others also. Since in this scenario everyone is both perpetrator and victim
You have to include yourself in this too. You are as responsible as everyone else. But if suffering is inevitable as you are suggesting then no one can
be morally responsible for it as they cannot exercise free will. Also I know I am less than perfect so do not need you to tell me this. And finally you
claim you can process information faster than anyone just because you are older than them. But remember there are many who are older than you
In fact I agree with you. There are various kinds of souls. An old soul is what you may be, that is, your chronological age may be dwarfed by the immensity of it.
Souls may be born newly like babies, where may they come from? Perhaps newbies come from hell, they have to oblige a recreation all over again from the very beginning. They have to relearn existence. That may be their punishment.
Very mature souls start from a priority which is their privileged starting point.
Rudolf Steiner had a lot of interesting things to say.
Everything dies because biological entropy increases over time and there is nothing which can be done to reverse this
Evil is not someone having something someone else wants neither is it even close to the actual definition of the word
I’ve seen the upside of down and the downside of up and everything between.
Who do you think you’re kidding?
People here want to be seen as good for having any type of something ness someone wants but doesn’t have and can’t get. And yes, it is inherently evil …
You have a brain this small (.)
And you’re trying to puff yourself up to most earthlings…
I more or less tend to side with ecmandu, but his logic is somewhat incoherent and undeveloped compared to mine.
In my ideal world, if someone was upper class, and someone else was a millionaire, I wouldn’t find this as an issue that needs fixing.
I view it more like a game, like a bit of competition helps fuel the game and make it function properly. But I find the glitches of the game, such as someone getting stuck on a wall, as hellish and unfair.
So for instance, if someone is stuck in total poverty, and never gets to have sex with anyone they desire, I view this a serious problem with the game that needs fixing. And that is why I tend to side with Ecmandu more or less.
I tend not to side with asexual Buddhist monks and moderns who pretend suffering and sexual frustration is not a real problem, and more with Ecmandu.
The problem with Ecmandu I have is that he seems to only focus on human souls and ignores the hell animals have to go through to feed human souls. This makes him logically incoherent.