An appropriate diversion here, to tie down the role of the various isms, inherent in consciousness, as in the previous post, the idealism, creating through and for the logical base of materialism; the question of infinity comes to mind, as relational to the paradoxical issues of Zeno, Canter, and many others. Canter went insane, for reasons over and above his predisposition to depression, and the main one pointed to by analysts have to do with the uncertainty surrounding the nominal versus the approximate nature of the infinite, and consequently the very idea of limits, of boundaries.
Nominally, how can there be a limitless infinity, if there were no limits? As it is , it is only the idea of a limit, which makes the limitless conceivable , and not the other way around.
The idea of the limitless cannot be conceived without it. Therefore the ideal is the congruence of further and further reductions of more specific limited spatio-temporal limits. Idealism passed the nominal picture of reality, passed into the phase, the Machianelli phase of uncertainty, whereupon, a transcendence had to be created, to verify and assure the nominal picture.
More and more uncertainty broke this picture of the ideal of a limited, nominal representation, and had to figure a way to understand boundaries in a different way.
The Einsteinian way of curving space time, is simply represented by a Moebius effect of convolutions surfaces, where the surfaces do not limit each other, and they merely fold in upon themselves. In this way limits, infinities and space-time can be understood as unnecessary concepts. In fact space-time itself is only a mode of conflating movement through time and creating space.
That is not to say that nothing exists, because the idea of no thing is contingent upon some thing, therefore, no duality there, as well.
The only conclusion which can be made is that there is always an absence that is both it’s very copresence, not that they exist or not.
It takes consciousness to create this chimera, the ideal of of which is the idea of the ground, the point-reason for IT, without which IT would, could not be.
This consciousness is not no thing either, nor is IT a thing, but without IT at the very least, awareness would stymie at the very minimal level of pre reflexive automatically instinctual level where even an inorganic/organic conflation would ,could not manifest.