Generation, Tradition, and the rise of the Far Right

Truth is, purporters of equality don’t bring about a world of equality.
Not that that would be a worthwhile ideal anyway but the world is not even moving towards it.

It’s just that they try to hamper and destroy those who they have been taught to hate, which is their betters. And frankly a lot of those betters are found among the Europeans. That, and it’s the better Europeans who they are exposed to. They are those who remind them daily of their feelings of inferiority.

We could say that all this equality screaming is going to bring about a world with more acid attacks (I’ll spare you the pictures), more child molestations and so on…
But, we should also not forget that it’s Europeans who brought about the abomination of the shitlib. And if you put that on the scales… Well, I guess we still have to go with promoting Europeans and their proliferation. Hey, it’s not perfect and we need a different eugenics program, counter to what brought forth the shitlib but it’s still better than the other options. The word is, superior.

One of those Memes, circulating in traditional circles…
Makes you go cookie.

:-k

Listen up gents!
Even cocksucker-gents seek to dominate and create the world a in their image of poop-dick, using their cocksucker-gents ways.

#UnderstandingShitlibs
#Cuckservatives

Where Im from which is gayparade central you have faggots and transgenders that come out but guys who are gay but still want to seem male they dont come out ever. Everyone knows this friend of a friend is hyper gay…but he keeps getting girlfriends. But one day I decided to talk to him about gayness and he began trashing the bar and ran out and his friend said he has never seen him like this. He is gay.

Did you only talk to him about gayness or were you gay with him?
…Which made him violently reject your advances, starting to ’trash’ that bar.
LOL,
Just kidding,
… I guess…

When you are open about gayness, even open for gayness, then you will probably feel that there is nothing wrong with your homosexual practices and the mindset which accompanies that.
So when you come across somebody who disapproves of homosexual acts and all the faggot mindset surrounding it then you will probably have a more difficult time to relate to this.
“What could anybody find disgusting about homosexual practices?”, thinks such a person.

So, what’s great about the “closet homosexual who disapproves of homosexuals” narrative is that you find a convenient way to explain away what you can’t and/or won’t relate to. And more importantly, you get to be clever and put the other on the defensive. It’s the joys of a defiler.

As for the cases of something like hyper-masculinity - If somebody falls into the category of hyper-masculinity then I find it reasonable to assume that they are very self-conscious about their masculine appearance in a social setting and since the “closet homosexual” narrative is quite prevalent, at least in popular appearance, I suspect that most men who’d fall into the hyper-masculine category would play the “I’m so secure in my masculinity, I’d even perform homosexual acts as proof of my feeling secure as a man” angle.

I’m gonna refrain from making my “You know why people hate Nazis?” joke now.

But maybe you meant something else, who knows.
Thanks for raising this issue though.

Hi Ys de Open are you a postmodernist? I am not. So try to make real, bio-sense.

I would not stick it inside your shriveled wormhole, but that dont make me gay. It just makes me tasteful. And maybe it hurts you, but I am not a Democrat, I dont believe you are entitled to good feelings just because you are a woman, or black, or gay, or transgender, or just plain atrocious to look at.

Merit is the key, also to sex.

Hey don’t hate the playa, hate the (((Nnnn…ew York Times))) who invented this upside-down social order where ugly faggots get all the girls.

What’s next, are they gonna air a sitcom where ugly, effeminate doofuses get the girls, the good jobs and their plastic Star Trek toys?

You are a great sounding board. With your help we gonna turn this place NewYorkTimes-wise in a matter of hours.

Don’t edit your posts when I’m in the middle of my reply.

Merit…
That’s that cohenservative talking point.
Are you a fellow cuckservative like me, J.?
Well then it’s alright, Jack.
As long as the merit of being a merry faggot will suffice, I’m fine with your merit plea.

Merit, lol. Based on our faggot values of radical inclusiveness.
But hey, at least you are not a Democrat. Gives you brownshirt points with me…
No, it doesn’t.,

And let all the worms flow forth from your canned good-s.

At the moment a very common attack on White Identitarians who oppose immigration is to say, “You just don’t like the competition.
While what it actually means is, “You just don’t like to be an atomised individual competing with an assembled collective opposing you.”
You have to compete as an atomised individual with no group identity.

You demoralise your enemy by saying he should be an atomised individual and see himself without having a group or he should think on such a large scale, like humanity, to include the enemy in his own group.
Both have the same effect.
The reality is competing groups because assembling as a group provides advantages. Both angles of attack are designed to disrupt the opposing group.

Same line of attack is the “Us Vs Them” thinking.
It’s about disrupting the opposition.

The cuckservative has internalised this virtue of group disassembly.

We shouldn’t expect any of those cuckservatives to come around about their suicide pact. They have been on that ideological trajectory for much too long.
Posterity will judge them as incredible dummies or as traitors, depending on their affiliations.

Cuckservative arguing tactic:

What’s especially hilarious about this thread is the way alt-rightist Uccisore is lumping ‘the Left’ altogether in the exact same way he accuses ‘the Left’ of doing.

Almost like he has no self-awareness at all. But then, this is a person who previously argued that because these black people over here committed some crimes that it’s ok for the police to shoot those black people over there who didn’t commit any crime.

For what it’s worth, I’ve seen a real schism since the Brexit/Trump votes between neoliberals (who are centrists, not leftists, but the alt-right calls them alternately ‘liberals’ and ‘cultural Marxists’ as though those two are one and the same) and socialists. Most socialists don’t give a toss about identity politics, and see the damage it has done to the left. Most neoliberals have simply said ‘OMG!!!’ on a loop because they were so blinkered they didn’t realise this could happen.

But even that isn’t as lame as the alt-right, a movement which is dying on its arse ever since its de facto leader (a gay Greek sociopath immigrant) outed himself as an apologist for paedophiles.

But please Ucci, tell me more about how the Right understands the reality of sex and gender. While giving their friends zero jail time for raping their 2 year old stepdaughter, and the like…

Why aren’t I just regular right? Why alt? I was on the right decades before the term even existed.

See, right off the bat you’ve just established that ‘alt-right’ is nothing more than a slur liberals use to denigrate and silence anybody they don’t care for. This sets the stage for exactly what I’m talking about. If you want to consider any ideas that aren’t liberal dogmatism, you’re branded the worst kind of bigot. So if somebody was curious about my ideas,and all they had to go on was somebody like you, they’d Google ‘alt-right’, and suddenly,

thanks to you

They’re reading about Richard Spencer instead of Russel Kirk. And that, I propose, is why the far right is on the rise.

That’s the point of my thread here; by the actions you take in which you declare everybody to the left of Rawls is a nazi, you make it impossible for people to explore moderate and conservative ideas without conflating them with the far right.

So you do get it, then. The part that you’re missing, though, since you didn’t think about what I wrote or probably even read it is that if a liberal is lumped together with people he disagrees with, all he needs to do to sort it out is take any high school social studies course, attend any university, watch any news channel, visit any subreddit, or subscribe to any social media.

Where?

Socialism is identity politics. It just assigns idenity by economic status instead of biology.

But that’s not what this thread is about. You seem to be somebody with a chip on his shoulder about some past conversation. COnsidering you have 7 posts in your history, I guess that makes you somebody that got banned once before, right?

Once there was a clever wench, or so she thot at least.
She came to me and whispered in my ear.
“You are just like the thing you hate!”

I asked her then, “Who is it that I hate?”
“You hate your rivals, you hate those who you fight!”, she said with a grin on her face.

“Aye”, I said, trying to sound like a man from the hills in the North.
“Let them be strong like me and worthy of my hate.”
“Speak! Do you hate those who are like you?”

The wench replied, “I am a flower like none other. I am beyond reproach! None shall have power over me with their words!”

Then I grabbed her face with my palm and pushed her away and laughed at her.

Moral of the story - Don’t take people seriously when they say you are just like your enemy, just like your political opponent, just like your rival, whatever. Just a silly attempt at basic bitch manipulation.
I am like my enemies? I hope not, let’s hope I am like my enemy times 10 to make my victory count.

Another parlour trick is the “I’m not this and not that, I defy all labels” BS.
Broken people who have given up and try to play it cheap, that’s all.

Btw. this Michael Jackson imitation reminds me of the Colonel from the Kentucky Fried Chicken buckets.

Huh, so my enemies are authoritative and have a vision for society.
I guess I have to cuck out and not stand up to them, else I might end up being just like them.
Checkmate for me there.

How did this happen? :frowning:

Michael Jackson, Uccisore isn’t alt-right he is at best alt-light. Milo Yiannopolous, the flamboyant race-mixing faggot the leader of the alt-right? You’re a fucking retard. And Trump isn’t anywhere near being alt-right.

I am alt-right. Alt-right is: Gas the kikes. Race war now, kill all niggers. Hitler did nothing wrong. I’m not a holocaust denier, I’m a holocaust wisher - I wish holocaust happened. THAT IS ALT-RIGHT.

If Milo was alt-right he wouldn’t be a fag sucking nigger dick, would he? And if Trump was alt-right he would have gassed the kikes and exterminated niggers already, or at least started both of these processes, wouldn’t he? But he didn’t, so fuck off.

Trump is just another neocuck. Milo is a liberal, obviously. You can’t be all this and claim to be alt-right, or even a basic conservative:

That’s liberalism. Milo is a liberal.

I’M RIGHT WING AND ANGRY!!!

BUT IT’S THOSE LIBERALS WHO LET THEMSELVES BE RULED BY EMOTIONS RATHER THAN FACTS!!!

God, you alt right snowflakes are so easy to provoke. I didn’t even have to try…

I’m sure the people running ILP are proud that this is now the level of political discussion you’ve engendered by putting a bigoted, nasty, sexually frustrated loser in charge of the politics forum. But I’ve had my fun, so I’m leaving now. Just thought I’d check in and see if things had descended to an even lower level than the last time I popped in here, and they have.

Seriously, I’d just shut this place down if it were up to me. It’s become just another cesspool where underemployed white guys who can’t get laid blame homosexuality, feminism and the Left for their personal failings in life. Admittedly, that’s about 30% of the internet at this point in time, but there’s no good reason to give these people a platform under the banner of philosophy…

Sexual abuse at a young age is a very common factor among homosexuals.
Some would argue that someone like Milo who got abused has coped with it by telling himself that he didn’t really get abused but that he was a willing participant.
This also falls in line with someone who is obsessed about victimhood. Not necessarily in the sense of proclaiming to be a victim, he could also be never a victim. Whatever happens, he was in control and wanted it to happen anyway. And if only other people were to learn and simply enjoy whatever is happening to them, that would be so much better.
No ‘self-victimising’, please.

The cuck phenomenon comes to mind.
Cucks want others to be cucks as well. They have learned to enjoy it and others should too, in particular because this gives them the feedback from fellow cucks, the message that it’s good to be a cuck.

Michael Jackson and his upbringing…makes for a fitting choice for a name.

You’re leaving already? B-but I was just heating up the ovens.

This could have been you, this could have been… US.

I reserve serious treatment for people and ideas that are worth it. I’ve had decent serious discussions in this very thread. You’re only good for this:

The day of the rope is coming, Mikey. Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQq9okyekJ4[/youtube]

So I managed to drive you away with only 1 post. I’m getting really good at making leftist liberals and cuck trolls fuck off. This is why we’re winning :wink:

He’s Michael Jackson, his solution to every problem is to just beat it.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRdxUFDoQe0[/youtube]