Magnus, you are steve
I’m adding one more observation about Steve.
Steve does his cocky laugh or sometimes raises his voice when saying it, but he says, “You’re never wrong, are you? You’re just always right and everyone in the world is always wrong.”
Actually, I’m right about a lot of things, and I’d easily win a court case with the general population if we had it out…
but that’s not the point I want to make…
Steve cannot see that he’s talking about himself when engaging me this way…
He literally does not have the capacity to hold up the mirror before or when he speaks…
something lots of people, myself included, are quite brilliant at.
I think Steve is primarily autistic, with elements of psychopathy and narcissism
My observations of Steve.
My issue is that most people are mentally sick on this world.
I was saying to Steve that everyone who doesn’t want suicide clinics are evil.
The point I make is that you can keep people alive against their will by making suicide more difficult, Steve without any sensitivity whatsoever to the idea of humane suicide and the mountains of evidence that suicidal tension exists which demonstrably keeps people alive (suffering) against their will (that’s why psych wards don’t have shotguns mounted to the walls of people checked in against their for expressing suicidal ideation and feelings)…
I made the extremely articulated point that if you have suicide as easy, cheap, painless, messless and humane as possible and nobody committed suicide that this would represent more purpose for the desire to live than if the same society has mass suicide. The idea being of course that people commit suicide when they think their experience is too abusive to represent purpose to live.
He replied that people commit suicide for different reasons, all he stated was some do it for attention (a logical fallacy - if you commit it, you are dead)
Suicide attempts for attention would never use methods that achieve certain death, so his argument fails here.
He also replied that my premises are flawed, so my conclusion is necessarily incorrect. He also said the dictionary doesn’t agree that suicide is the taking of ones own life because of lack of foreseeable purpose in the future in context. And because the dictionary doesn’t say that, I am wrong.
My argument for defining people who don’t want the aforementioned suicide clinics as evil, is that transparency for what systems work better or worse for representing meaning and purpose for living intersubjectively has no transparency or accountability to measure one system against the next and select the ones that work best, so that we can use this knowledge to make society objectively more purposeful, and compassionate along the way. I explained that people don’t want this transparency because they use other people as trinkets for self esteem, and for financial gain (they are slaves to systemic corruption - the elite cattle mentality - ranging from parents all the way to the state) You can prove they are slaves because they ask for more humane methods and don’t get them.
Steve additionally stated there is no “love” in my system - not keeping people alive against their will and working transparently for better systems to keep them here of their will is the definition of love of life itself, love of the subject choosing to die, and love of figuring out subsequently how to keep them here in the future. Not everyone wants to be a lab rat, some people don’t care, others love being lab rats.
Ethics is the science of what is right or wrong, what path to take for desired outcome, good and bad. It is demonstrable that if suicide is as easy for everyone as possible, and nobody commits it ever again, then it is inter subjectively more correct by every beings own self reporting, ethics is a subset of life in general, so whatever reenforces life, entails, by necessity the answers to ethics (correct vs. incorrect). The lack of suicide clinics can thus be proven as incorrect because it contradicts compassion and completely removes transparency and accountability to represent purpose and meaning in the only valid scientific way.
Steve, starting to get defensive, began to say things like…
“Ethics doesn’t have a solution, it’s all subjective and always evolving”
I just gave a proof for it, of course it does!!
Then he stated, "You’re the only person who thinks this way, and even if you want it, there’s no money in it. I’m a realist and you’re escaping into a fantasy world, and you’re fantasy world isn’t going to help you recover, it shows me that you don’t want treatment
Then he started doing his condescending, dismissive laugh, "I don’t care about your theories, which are wrong, all I see in you is that you are kind to people, intelligent and you’ve had a lot of suffering and PTSD, and I think you have increased capacity which needs to find an outlet. (in a much less kind way than I just put it).
When I explained that no matter what you do in this world, you’re going to hurt people, which is also easy to demonstrate: youtube.com/watch?v=bzNQntQ1QHM
Steve starts to raise his voice, and says:
"Everyone chooses how they respond to situations " He actually talks to me like Ben did at
(Translate by me “so it’s their problem if they respond negatively for anything I do” (autism/psychopathy) - autonomic nervous system reactions for crushes and hurt feelings, but Steve thinks everything emotional is by choice to this regard.
So Steve retorts with a very cocky laugh, it’s not my fault if I murder someone? Maybe not Steve, but you should be locked up for it!!
Then he says, “well you think we should all just kill ourselves” That’s not what I’m saying, I’m saying in the absence of suicide clinics, we are not only being inhumane, for ourself esteem, we are destroying the species by having no accountability to life systems, the rot of life, Steve is the evil he thinks is wrong, and he can’t even see it.
My observation of Steve is that he’s clearly autistic, me just expressing myself makes him extremely defensive, he raises his voice when this implication is that all of his life was ill gotten gains (which he likes to brag about).
There are two pieces of work I’ve done that Steve hasn’t, VERY deep psychological work!
I had to come to terms, that I was evil for most my life to get happiness, and then I did the even deeper work of realizing that I’m going to hurt people here (in this world system) against my will, no matter what I do.
Steves view of life is simple, everything is about what reproduces offspring. I can prove that Steves way of reproducing is a contradiction to his stated goal. That he’s been a hypocrite his whole life.
So Steve just waves his hands and calls it all my opinions, and incorrect theories.
Ask any questions about my proof if there is a lack of understanding.
It’s not my job to fix steve, he’s basically an asshole, he’s defensive and he gets passive aggressive and actually aggressive when holding time with me, and he has autism. I don’t think he’s qualified to psychoanalyze an empath. I typed this whole letter in a nicer way than Steve actually speaks to me and behaves around me.