Thing is, you are relying on a bunch of shitlibs and leftists to fight your battles, most of whom are as insane, orwellian, and tyrannical as the left, if not even more so.
Trixie, when I have friends like you, why need I rely on the Far Left or anyone else for that matter, which is for the most part as stupid and misguided as anyone else We will (use logic to) control the Far Left , instead of being “beaten” by them…
Well, I know, and how hard it can be.
The trick is to allow logic – not the self, but statements of pure logic (as truly and objectively defined as possible) --to control and manage the difficult parts of society. That will be viable & appreciated by all.
Objective Logic is elusive, I know, but I think i’ve found what matters and I share with you…
If you have any plan for transformation, written down, let me know if i can add to it (by adding on my science of entropy, depression/dementia-prevention etc.), so that it becomes irresistible to mankind.
I’ll then send it over for you or your folks to edit…
I agree, we can ban all religions, but this will only work if you agree that we in fact need to ban the more general phenomenon, herdist misuse of linear thinking, let’s call it dogma.
The correct (more generic) term is dogma, rather than “religion” – as easily concluded from the presence of a variety of other abominably absurd dogmas in the world:
the “war to end all wars” dogma
Tthe "Mein Fuhrer ist gut" dogma (aka nationalism*)
notably the world’s 2 self-proclaimed “greatest democracies”, USA and India, are involved in the maximum number of cases of foreign troop deployment…
“the teacher is wise, he knows more than me; therefore I should remember what he says” dogma
the “psychiatrist is wise, as he is an expert in his field, I must eat the tablets he prescribes” dogma
the “capitalism is good, because communism was bad” dogma
the pseudo-scientific yet madly popular, and very elaborate (obscurantist) “mythomatics” and pseudo-physics of the “Einstein-Oppenheimer” school
the “usury is good because the great economist said so” dogma
the “It is the supreme court, therefore it is right” dogma
the “cigarette is given by lord of the zigurat; it is therefore good” and “cannabis is evil since it makes one mad” dogma
the “man went to the moon” dogma
And of course, the well-entrenched “dinosaurs exist" or "nukes exist” dogmas…
Lol…
I may be what you call a “globalist”,
but I’m more like a free pro-“globalism” ideologist,
not a stool pigeon linked to a greater power.
Well met, Mr. stool pigeon of the nationalists!
Not necessarily a contradiction. If you understand the (potential) ideal nature of globalism: it is just the sacking, or rather reemployment, of nationalist and macroeconomic “parasites”.
This can naturally only be followed by the disintegration of (anti-individualist) evil in all its forms (financial/usury/central bank cultism, herdist: zealous religionism etc.)