Some educator I am. lol I didn’t even notice the cells with the labels.
Educator
Educators are drawn to teaching. If this is your soul type, you’ll have a gift for persuasion that can be used in a conventional setting, such as a classroom, or in a less traditional venue like the boardroom or an online discussion forum. Getting your point across is something that comes naturally to you.
Since education is your purpose, if you do end up in a classroom, you’ll have no problem with repetition—going over the same point until it sinks in, or teaching the same subject year after year. Whether it’s in a classroom or in a less formal setting, you may show remarkable patience when it comes to explaining your point. It is important for you to know you’re being understood. You may have a tendency to be long-winded or to adopt an air of superiority at times.
Most Educators have a desire to demonstrate what they know to others. There’s little point in having knowledge without having students to pass it on to, which is why you will generally be comfortable in front of a class or other groups of people, knowing you have much to offer. Family members make great students and may become a captive audience at times.
Much of what you know may come from reading and study, but you may also have natural insight into a subject, often accumulated over many lifetimes. Educators are comfortable in academic pursuits and enjoy acquiring knowledge, particularly through books.
First of all, it’s obviously measuring your own self-image, not the way you really are. The questions are: where to you rank yourself.
Second, some of the questions are really bad questions: are you a leader or a follower? Well, neither! Nobody follows me and I don’t follow anybody. I’m kind of “outside” of things. Or the question about: do you like to argue with people? Across the internet, yeah, but in person, no… sooo, which is it?
This is why I’m a jack of all trades. For most of the questions, I was like: Idunno. I’ll pick 3.
Actually gib may have an interesting test. What if a person is designated and the others take that test by giving their opinion of that person… interesting or no?
The validity of this test seem to exclude the + or - factor of possible error, some or all of which depend on the truthfulness of given answers. It may be a pure projection of an ideal sense of self, and it’s supposed correspondence with its interjected value.
The deflection may vary wildly, even when it appears to the test taker that it is his honest opinion of himself. It may not represent the degree of that, of which people over or undervalue each question, since some untruthfullness have been so deeply repressed.
A missing question such as ‘do I tend to over or undervalue myself’ should be relevant, and governing.
The test, even if posed by a psychic’s standard, seem too simplistic.
People always undervalue themselves. I was just chatting about this, it’s the reason that the world is so screwed up, that people do not understand their worth. If you find it difficult to value yourself, you will be unable to value elsewhere.
Again, it’s pretty even. Not knowing you very well meant a lot of 3’s down the page. Also, on the rare occasion when I felt I did have a definite answer, it went to the extreme (1 or 5). It seems there’s rarely any uncertainty in the minds of other when they think they know something about a person.