Why I am superior.

Competent assistance is always nice.

Well… As I explained in gibs thread, you go to hell eventually if you don’t solve everyone’s problems.
If they don’t want their problems solved, that’s not your fault, and you still go to heaven.

Ec wrote

Are you sure you don’t have that backwards? Solve yourself first and you won’t be hindered by yourself first. How are resources limited?

Nah… You are one of and involved with and are everyone.

If you neglect solving “Norma’s” problem from the kleptu galaxy… It becomes your problem, it will hell you eventually as it hells her.

Go here. http://www.spiritualforums.com/vb/index.php Spirit Guide Sparrow (the user’s name) offers many insights which seem to be similar to what you describe, maybe something there will help.

You are not everyone. I am not you and you are not me. We have our own paths. Norma from Klepto has her own path to figure out for herself. Spirit Guide Sparrow wrote a whole bit about evil entities and how they become so. Are you trying to re-attach an evil spirit to its original identity by force? People, souls, have to want redemption to have it.

viewtopic.php?p=2656041#p2656041

Read these three posts.

Not all dimensions have individuality…

Individuality dimensions are preferred…

Arguing with beings you co share with or have all your memories is not fun!!

lol I thought that there was a scratching head smilie here somewhere.

I read the one the link took me to. Where are the other two?

There’s something called memory overlap which isn’t a presence issue.

Cohabiting sucks though…

If someone snorts cocaine which you’ve never done - from across the globe, you feel it being snorted …

Cohabitation really sucks …

Hmm…

I’m reaching a point where I want to censor myself…

Sorry that wasn’t useful

Co-habitation? As in a soul group?

Good question! Amazingly, most people wouldn’t know to ask it, or ask it that way…

Usually it is a soul group!!!

Singles are rare

I’m a single so…

I’m really trying to grasp your experiences in relation to my own since we are coming at this from different places.

:question:
The notions of inferiority and superiority are not absolute truths, but misleading artificial, incomplete thus imperfect constructs of partially-aware egos, that only partially scan small parts of the world around them, in a selective manner, picking what they like to suit their delusions. So what if you beat the blind man at seeing things? He’ll beat you at listening to things, just that you might not allow such a competition. Maybe around 99% of the posts in this forum could use a purge of such delusive ego-linked elements in their content.

You’re contradicting yourself.

How can you beat the blind man at seeing and him beat you at hearing if there’s not objective lines to determine superior faculty.

Seems like you’re part of that 99%.

Wendy, once you realize that this world has some good ingredients, but is inherently evil because when you win, someone else loses. You are awake. Then it’s all about laws of manifestation.

viewtopic.php?p=2656274#p2656274

Well, no, I guess i gotta elaborate my point further.
There can be superiority in specific faculties of one person’s over the other’s, that is true, but the notion of absolute superiority of one person over the other is absurd. That’s what I implied.

Ahh…

Why not?

Let’s say there are two types of people:

1.) someone who spends their whole life trying to send every being in the cosmos to hell forever

2.) someone who spends their whole life trying to send everyone in the cosmos to heaven forever

You’re talking of hypothetical models, not real people… or show me a type 1) and a type 2)…? Point out any such people in this world? Immediately your argument would collapse…

I can reason metaphysically as well. Take your hypothetical type 1.) person.
Say some psychopath. You think he is worthy of hanging?
Or let me try this: do you think that all lions, who’d kill men at first sight, are worthy of a cold-blooded purge?
I bet you don’t think so.
So, is this psychopath a worse fellow than the lion? At most, you’d say the two are equivalent in your notion of “hierarchy”… this guy is “an animal, not a man”… OK, but does he deserve hanging, which even the lion doesn’t deserve?
I don’t think so… I’m not trying to declare the notion of morality absurd, I’m just saying that… the world is imperfect. It makes men do imperfect things. A sad fact. Sad absurdities, like usury, have made men seem absurd.
But men are not, if their genes were allowed a chance to express in all their potential idealities – in themselves absurd or inferior to this one or the other. I’ll show you a guy who would, in any other situation, would have been a psychopath murdered by the state, but, due to the decreasing absurdity of the world, actually manages to contribute:

theatlantic.com/health/arch … th/282271/

So, what to do with the psychopaths? Let them roam free? Nah, just put them in better circumstances. Better than jails or guillotines…
For example, quoting from my book Dethroning Idiocracy:

There are billions of men; and some like violence only for its own sake. Who are we to judge them, especially if we can’t so easily change them, and especially given how, for them have evolved to be as they are, the cause certainly was society’s chronic failure in the past? However, even in case of such “incurable” types, we can at least accommodate their personalities in our new order; and how to do that? Psychopathic types may bring death only to their own type of people (if at all they insist). That is to say, people who are inclined to fight must refrain from thoughts of slaughtering random women and children; these champions of humanity may instead fight each other in specific areas, to determine the true braves of mankind. For, who else will defend mankind against hostile Extra Terrestrials that may at any time arrive? Thus, those who don’t like the idea of playing computer games to cool off, will be given the opportunity to wage ‘war’ in certain infected zones – like perhaps the DMZ, parts of Sudan, parts of Syria etc.; the warlords from the UA and the FA will be invited to move station to these designated warzones, whose populations will be relocated. In these limited warzones, they will compete to prove their mettle, for fame, in real, and balanced rather than unfair, contests: war-games for the jumpiest, richest or the most “psychopathic” of our race. These areas can also serve as zones for negotiation; and for the maintenance of peace, as firing shells and bullets in such areas won’t be without its risks. This solution also saves the rest of the world from war. Of course a few such games may be fake and harmless, but not all may be content with that – all war-mongers, militaristic adrenaline junkies and tough soldier types who prefer violent ‘enjoyment’ – may take to the field, buy guns and equipment, and prove their manhood by “playing war” – increasing in rank, buying command of tanks and armies! This “warplay” can have, as in all competitive games, decisive outcomes.

Anyway… I will firmly stand by my claim that all are equal (men, animals, etc.) and must be treated with the respect they deserve as “victors” (for having been born into our glorious earth, the sperm who won the race to the egg. You know how many sperms compete for that? Millions. One who is born through the one who wins it, is already a victor, and need not belly dance before the moneyed to “prove” his worth… i bet you agree!).

You talk about winners and losers in the same breath that you say nobody is better.

I can guarantee you that there are many beings trying to put everyone in heaven…!!

Someone trying to put everyone in hell may just be a myth.

What about the difference between someone trying to put everyone in heaven and someone trying to put everyone in heaven besides one or more people??

That’s real!!

Which one is better?

Obviously the one trying to put everyone in heaven.

Just axiomatically a better being.