Trump’s constituency are like well mannered children , brought up on the idea that if ideas and politics are conserved in the manner in which they were believed to be through, passed along by so called unchanging and proper behavior, we can make it despite the
compelling need for change.
A pluralistic society need not cast a glance to the age
old discussions going on between Parmenides and Heraclitus, as to a static view of a rightful society, or one predicated on constant change should constitute the ideal city-state.
Or the same conservatives may look foreward into a post humanistic world view, where they may ask
whether the dots are connectable as well. Can they?
Hardly, except by revising the data, or the rules by which historical revisions become fodder to every
Nuevo politician, who feels in himself imbued with unplanted oats, sustained levels of testesterone, usually with disastrous inauthenticity leading to mass hysteria. Once the suppression is lifted, alas usually
too late, it is over.
.
The multi ethnic dictum is not new, it has always
been the model for the world, ever since immigrants
became the source of populations in the US.
To restrict immigration now, where the rationale for it
simply does not exist, in the light of being able to
weed out undesirables, reduces the idea of the mix toward cleansing, genetic purification , narrow nationalism, where even a Germany of the 2nd Reich,
the arbiter and proponent of haute kultur this trend is
resurfacing, based on no modern equivalent, not going against the modern emerged notions of socio-political science. Some may vehemently disagree here, and within explicable rationale. But such a disagreement is oft a sublimely conflated retrogressive desire to return into a Romsntic idiom, more personal then social. There simply, there is no society on earth, where reactionary ideas can flourish. If, as in this case, it may, given Trump’s oratory skills and drawing personality, America may be privy to such, given its recurrent political naïveté.
So what can the deductions made to adults instead of well wishing children, totally unaware of the mistake
of trying to reverse a necessary trend? That it is
thinking alone that history could necessitate a trend which always reduces great empires to humility, and reality? Is such reality is unacceptable, can a failed reality show, pertain to the supression of a failed and unappreciation of a great artistic preforming genius?
Again perhaps. But what if the the outcome does not correlate to the result? Then the center will cave, certainly, and there are only to avenues to buttress this weakness: by an outward push of invading others’s sensibility, or an internal purge. Both may be attempted, simultaneously, sometimes not so subtly, by an imminent attack on the system of judicial oversight.
That the greatness of America has always consisted in its ideals and not of its affectations of an indolent and misinformed populace, which can continue to hold in the mistaken belief that it’s standard of living will always tend to be over and above of every other
society on earth?
Sure some orator can kiss ass to these delusional children, who have declared history dead, nothing at
all worthy of any kind of study, where, the only sure thing
is , like in a snail, to revert into the shallow walled safety of its own shell, and wait for the magic time, when they come out, and experience Abe’s the Oeggy
Sue
Peggy Sue type
naïveté of an era of shallow and naive innocence, driving candy colored cars, and disputing what effects they have caused? The Ugly American did come back
full blast, and the Vanishing Adolescent has left the
scene to retract into an idiotic
show of a childish reality, where stern Papa can fire at whim those whom he merely dislikes? A return to
the affects and probable thr effects of a pure late 19
, early 20 th century capitalism, where things were horrible, except the good old boys who looked and acted the part?
Sure, why not, if morality and amorality will become the grey area where one man’s goose is
unrecognizable from another’s gander. Sure, why not,
if what is promised, is what one gets, but is there a silly assumption which can assure such, where the handwriting is on the opposite may be the case?
All signs point in that direction right now, and it may get worse, a lot worse. Where deeper the doubt
surfaces, the more the denials will cause search for a
target whereupon these denials will target their forces, to escape the awful realization of self doubt?
Is this exactly what children do, every time, knowing full well the consequences of trying to hold their elders responsible, and the futility of lashing out at
them.
Is it simply a very clear difference between what is normal here, or abnormal?
Are those daring to question sanity akin to repressed children, trying to get rid of individual belief in favor of
what is politically correct among some undefined political elite?
The questions have to be asked to pursue the American Dream.