It feeds you. You live on it. Addicted. If you don’t get ‘it’ you are a crab and a rather toxic guy to be around. You are the ringmaster of a circus of incivility.
Any time I can provide you your fix and we can get about with a more civil discourse; I’m your dealer. I’ll peddle you your hearts desire.
I don’t think I’ve said how smart Ucci is. It’s really quite amazing. Everyone must agree.
Interesting question Ucci. I certainly have no record of ever being banned for it, no record for even being issued a warning for it, in your forum or any of the others. That could in part be due to a rather lax tolerance for it in general. Anytime you’d like to issue me a warning, and you’ve had the capacity all along.
Does this post represent the sort of high caliber philosophical discussion you have in mind? I’d view it as spam. We may be in a discussion that I tried to turn it into a debate but you weren’t interested and Carleas stated that’s not how it works. Now we have a member active in your forum spreading it here. It is in your favor, so you are not likely to see it as spam, but, it sure looks like it.
I’ve ‘spanked’ members who have supported my position, if all it looks like is spam.
That is no secret. But that is your response to the discussion at hand? That’s how you make a case? What difference does it make? How is it a valid response and not just more spam?
You get under my skin like crazy. It is really hard not to scratch. But like I’ve said, I’ve never been banned or warned for incivility, and it appears your “position” provides you insulation from that as possibility.
Read your past four or five replies in this thread. What discussion is it that you imagine to be ‘at hand’? I made a point, you declared the discussion over and spammed a bunch of retarded fucking nonsense about how emotionally cripped and idiotic you are. You may recall, this is exactly what I predicted you would do when I was explaining to you why a debate isn’t happening between us. This is, in fact, what you always do when somebody you’re discussing with makes a point.
So yes, that is my response to you because that sort of thing is what you deserve. Feel free to contribute in a meaningful way to any of the dozens of interesting conversations going on on this message board at this very moment, and prove how wrong I am about your function here.
Calm down. You seem to be letting your temper get the better of you. Just like before, you become so intolerable when you reply in such an uncivil manner. You’ve got the symptom nailed straight away, the cause on the other hand continues to elude you. But there you go. When you use that tone, example that ethos.
It is a good example of why you aren’t a very adept moderator.
Perhaps you could share a little more regarding what
That might be insightful.
I am. You may disagree with what I consider meaningful but that would be an additional question to the one about how uncivil a moderator on this forum can be, not a replacement or distraction to that question.
I am not a moderator, that is your function here. I didn’t have a function here but I’ve been kicked around by you long enough.
You couldn’t handle an actual philosophical debate with me. If Uccisore can beat you so easily you wouldn’t make it with me. You’re not even in the same league as me buddy. I do enjoy your liberal (Marxist) tears however, it’s so delicious…