That’s a mathematical barrel rotation, with something added in…
Now add set theory to barrel rotations and you get the above or something, ~ What method have you used to add the zero’s in? I assume they are injectives, but if you have randomly added them in with no basis, then your lack of rule is indeed going to arrive at infinite or denumerable amounts of zero’s. what I mean is that reality has to have a reason for adding something into its equation/schemata, if it even has such a thing. the universe does have limits though, which is a bit like a kind of one-dimensionality. Like how far can you stretch an elastic band, …and you reach denumerable amounts due to that limitedness. if that’s what you mean?
I am intrigued by adding dimension, but if we are going to add that in then each number will have its own or indeed be its own dimension. If not we would then have to add a further factor/s to determine why some numbers do have dimension and others de not. If we are attempting to describe maths outside of or otherwise beyond that which exists in the physical universe, I would imagine that any rule we add would be universally applicable ~ without further rule to determine otherwise. Point being that we are adding in rules AFTER any primary maths could have occurred, so we need reasons why we should be using and adding them.
Isn’t any primary math without rule?! - genuinely interested btw.
_
