I do, and it like, has wiki pages and books, St. John of the Cross wroteva book on it, Mother Theresa was practically sainted over it.
Show me your a INTJ. Look up the Mandaeans a bit more, and this topic. I provided basic information, as I noted, I’m not a qualified theologian, and haven’t been given permission to preach. I gotta submit my works to a Bishop for review, even if just a internet post, on topics like this, to explain in depth. Many Catholics don’t bother anymore, but I’m highly conservative, knowing full well the history of the interrelation of philosophy to the church.
So look those works up. I explained above why I wouldn’t go farther. I don’t think your interested in conversion, if you were, I would suggest a local Catholic experienced in philosophy. What is left is just providing accurate information that isnt too theoretical or insightful… I’m intelligent and insightful enough to acvidently explain the stuff too damn well, and don’t want the headache of a international tribunal of bishops when I’m 70 analyzing the positions I’ve made, looking for mistakes or heresies because I’ve accidently started a movement. I’ve said it many time before, I’m not a Catholic philosopher, but a philosopher who happens to be Catholic. I don’t push the theology that much, if you knew anything about our history you would know why. It’s stricter in other churches, you can’t even talk about Aristotle in the US branch of the Greek Orthodox Church, I’m walking anathema whenever I’m around them, so just shake my head no. That makes absolutely no sense to you, but if you understood the rivalry between the two churches, you would grasp why it’s all weird. Has nothing to do with the faith per say, but control of the message, both sides had suffered nasty heresies that nearly destroyed the church, and my preference is to the continuation of the church. in the same manner Leto II was for the continuation of the Been Gesserite. It’s essentially a very good institution, whatever it’s administrative hiccups, and mankind is much better off with it than without it. It survives the collapse of nations and civilizations. I can pay the cost of holding my tongue on certain topics, in return for what good it does locallyband internationally. They may well become one of the few holders of any remains of my philosophies actually, excellent librarians. Everyone’s fortunes are ultimately tied in them. Only a few institutes come close to paralleling aspects. Library of Congress can pull off it’s book keeping, not it’s ethical and lower political capacity, or international ability to coordinate political and medical help. Caliphates have died off, UN and WHO somewhat does that, yet still relies in large part on them.
Which do you think is gonna last longer? Do I really want to piss them off in this regard, even accidently? They will he with us till the end of days, it will outlast anything else we can conceive. I have no intention of breaking this essential rule.
That’s not the religion. That’s not Jesus, that’s not Moses, that’s not the faith, but it is something I have profound respect for. Where do you think our posts will ultimately reside in 50,000 years? US, UN mainframe? It’s gonna be in some Catholic database. I have equally less desire to upset them as bishops now. They are forever, till the last. Everything eventually must past through the church. That’s the lesson of history, that’s the trajectory we are still very much on.