Suicide should be available to everyone

Just in time for that satanic social darwinist who came back to chime in. Let him figure out how to combine those three ideas into one coherent method.

If a person wants to commit suicide, should we stop them? And,why? :wink:

Satanic ritualistic suicide?

The word is moot, not mute.

Congress is representative democracy in our system.

There is no guarantee of even a hypothetical democracy of legislation for a body of specialists

I challenged Uccisore in debate to see who is crazier, me or him. He’s afraid, and rightly so… Look at my link here…

viewtopic.php?p=2645829#p2645829

Uccisore likes to ad hom and delete threads…

But runs scared when challenged

My suicide method preference is to jump out of a private jet, but I am not rich enough to afford one?

Suicide is a matter of balancing personal freedom with social responsibility…

If you jumping doesn’t leave a grotesque mess for others to clean up after, I see no problem with it.

Even though we don’t want to be here, we still have social observances to uphold to not die a hypocrite…

Like being a suicide bomber, or jumping off a bridge etc…

I don’t give a shit about the ‘suicide’ section of this thread.

I would like to improve the quality of this site but since only about 3 of us are interested, almost certainly nothing will change.

He doesn’t think that he is crazy … that was all rhetorical bullshit.

Me or Uccisore , if so, why?

You say I don’t make any sense… Who doesn’t think they are crazy, me or Uccisore …

Rhetorical bullshit, me or Uccisore

And lastly, why

Uccisore doesn’t think that he is crazy … that was all rhetorical bullshit.

Who was rhetorical bullshit, me or Uccisore ?

This is rhetorical bullshit:

Uccisore wrote : “There’s me, for example. I’m pretty clearly a few sandwiches short of a picnic, ask anybody who knows me.”

As soon as Turd points out the logical flaw, Uccisore retreats from it.

That’s what I thought you meant, just checking

Although, In all fairness…

Uccisore said “if all crazy was the same, then yes”

My issue here with moderation is simple …

Both Uccisore and Carleas have said outright that I’m clearly mentally ill, with no content.

I’ll debate them both at the same time in debate forum.

OH can be the judge !!

:laughing:

They would never define it as “the same crazy”. It’s Animal Farm. A hypocritical ‘equality’.

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

Here’s my challenge…

viewtopic.php?p=2646042#p2646042

We can actually resolve this dispute, we don’t have to spin in circles.

Unless I’m mistaken, Phyllo, you brought the whole “Mentally Ill people posting on ILP” thing up. So it’s strange that you would apparently know so staggeringly little about mental illness. Would you ban somebody from the forums because they are deathly afraid of spiders? Or somebody that suffers from Vietnam flashbacks? Or somebody with schizoid personality disorder? Or a homosexual? Ecmandu is crazy in one of those particular ways that make him virtually worthless as a contributor here. I don’t think I am. It wasn’t purely rhetorical bullshit, but I am rather amazed that you’re still concerned with it.

I brought up mental illness as it impacts posts made on the site.

Then Carleas said that “philosophy is full of kooks and normal people don’t ask these questions” to make a rhetorical point. Then you chimed in “I’m crazy too” to make a rhetorical point.

Why fuck would you say that you are crazy if you know full well that “it’s not the kind of crazy that fucks up the site”?

You two are disingenuous.