In a spirit of sincere good will and constructive criticism, I’ll tell you how I interpret that post, and you can consider or dismiss what I have to say as you choose.
You aren’t trying to present an idea that’s in any way accessible to your audience. You’re presenting a crackpot-ish idea, seemingly with no awareness of how crackpot-ish it sounds. Then you’re effectively demanding that if anyone wants to understand it, they need to get on your level because you’ll make no effort to explain it in a way that’s accessible to anyone who isn’t already inside your head. And you reject a major body of work on the kind of problem you seem to be concerned with, further indication that normal means of inquiry will be fruitless. That obstinacy reads, most charitably, as showing off, and least charitably as being full of shit.
Reading this, I think to myself, What are the odds this random guy on the internet has anything worth exploring? And what are the odds that some random guy on the internet who won’t or can’t clearly and directly explain his position is nonetheless sitting on some deep philosophical insight? And, assuming this is such a guy, what are the odds that the worth of this thing is so great that it offsets what will likely be an arduous slog through this random internet guy’s back catalog, and perhaps months of carefully crafting questions like answers to a zen koan in order to get a little more color on what the hell random internet guy is talking about?
And I conclude that all those odds are just about zero, and, while you might have something, I have effectively no reason to expect that you have something, and yet less reason to think I can get you to explain it. I have no reason to risk wasting my time, when there’s already a limitless supply of other reading material that’s pre-vetted by people whose opinions I trust and, moreover, that is presented with the aim of explaining the ideas its advocating.
And then I stop reading your post. I know that your post isn’t meant to be a full exposition of the idea, but if you’d linked to a full exposition of your idea I would very likely not follow it.