The comparison you made is a leap - The unstated object of my statement was “your posts” and not “your life”. With this additional information, to say:
“your posts make more than zero sense but not quite the amount of money it costs to kill someone” is perhaps a better word substitution
however it takes away the homonyms in my original word choice
You make sense, you’re just wrong. I mean, it’s not just that your premisses are wrong, your arguments are invalid as well; but I’ve still been able to follow your reasoning, in the little I’ve read of you. A Logic 101 class may go a long way. Tell me when you’ve taken one, then I may unfoe you.
I could not vote, you should have had another more neutral choice like undecided. I think it is wrong for you to ask this because your poetry is your poetry. A lot of good poetry like Pond don’t make too much sense to some readers, but that means nothing. I am not saying you are as good as Pond, but your own sense of what you mean matters. If you find some one, even one who can read it, then it’s worth the effort. I like some of your stuff, but then I am not too critical, except only as far as my capacity to understand .
Ecmandu, I put you on ignore (foed you) because from what I’d read of you, it didn’t seem worth it to argue with you. But apparently you interpret it as proof of my not being a “sentient enough being” to understand you. Okay, well then…
Where’s your logically and realistically “unassailable” essay?
To answer your question no your posts make absolutely no sense at all as they are incoherent rambling streams
of nonsense. And so maybe that is why Satyr nominated you as the craziest one here on a forum full of psychos
The only thing that’s never really made any sense out of your posts is your idea to create a whole new universe in which no one gets hurt and everyone’s happy, but you invariably fail to explain how that’s done.
I also disagree with your link between the male suicide rate and nice guys not getting pussy. I think when it comes to suicide, by definition it is chosen by free will, and not a causal effect from some other factor.
^ But that’s a disagreement, not a failure to make sense out of what you’re saying.
I suppose the first item is too–creating a whole other universe–but in that case I’d call it an incomplete explanation.
^ So I take back my vote: everything you say makes sense–I just disagree with it or need further information before I can agree or disagree.