I said elsewhere, look at Malcolm X’s autobiography, he explored the confusion his community in Harlem experienced during the height of racism, the residents contracted for role reversals, such as Mr. Monopoly fucks wanting to be literally pampered in diapers and tucked in.
It doesn’t fit a Freudian more of interpretation because you can match the neurachemical cascade to the appreciation of the event. I don’t think ENTJs are evil, or motivated by power, they don’t have a “dark side” anymore than Scorpius had one. He looked like he absolutely did, walking image of a BDSM character, but he wasn’t at all. He was motivated by compassion and fear for innocence, and a desire for revenge and destruction to a impossible to defeat threat. Everything else was a tool to get there, including himself.
INTJs are the most complete introspective self one can be. Nothing else better sits in the internal mesh of the feedback loops of the mind, I’ve had it described in the mind as looking akin to a octopus for my exact subtype of INTJ (he will pop up on this website eventually you’ll see, he us far worst than Shieldmaiden).
For a emotion to have internal meaning, it must be triggered, and this trigger has to set off a chain reaction, and this reaction if it becomes a fetish is controlled. Most people can’t control it if course, you can’t ever see the whole feedback loop, you at best experience a aspect and can make a choice or two consciously, the rest is unconscious. People like to prescribe meaning beyond this, it is a pointless activity, it’s unconscious. If you could understand it, you likely wouldn’t do it.
I’ve never had empowerment or dominition fantasies, don’t want to hurt or be hurt. Simple. I just want a woman I can do literally anything I want to do. Doesn’t mean I’ll be standing with a bullwhip as she swings around the room tied upside down by the ankle, but I want the option once the door is closed to grab her by the back of the neck, lead her to the shower, strip her and put her in the shower, and spend the night fucking her senseless, from the shower to bed to floor to wall to chair in front of the window, and I want to be able to look at her in aroused wonder and amazement, knowing she is dressing for me when out.
I can’t get interested in most BDSM, do like those Japanese Silk Rope tying, but that’s far less because I want to Freudian tie up woman and make her my property, blah blah blah… No, my part of the mind manages the conjunction between geometry and logic VIA imagination through physical activity. Same reason I looked at the lace being made in system, or a captive column being constructed, but with erotic beauty added.
I’m unlikely to ever do it as it would be cruel, because you should know by now, I would never be in a relation with someone I didn’t care for, and I’m compassionate. This could just as easily be expressed as love for plays, a director controlling the stage of actors, every detail, or a symphony.
Remember, I said I’m neither Alpha nor Beta. I can project traits without being it. INTJs have choice. Lots of people can’t. Doesn’t mean we have full free will either, but you won’t ever find a “side of darkness” or “light” in me. The conflict is I exist on a rift in the mind, a completer of actions. A maker and destroyer of ideas and actions, pure genius. That isn’t darkness or the light. We tend to be highly compassionate and caring. Not sure why I’m expected to have “everything”, I’m not a ESTP. I already have understanding that that won’t fulfill me. A woman always fulfills a man, as long as she us worthwhile. For a guy like me, well… you know the saying “it’s always the quiet ones”. I’m a endless font of invention and curiosity, never ceased trying new things. Side effect of the personality. Just, we aren’t universally attracted to all women either. I’m a little confused how INTJs tend to get top rating as romantic characters by so many different women, yet we find most of them unappealing.