31/2 = 31 divided into 2 pieces. - each piece = 15.5, [2 * 15.5 = 31]
31/0 = 31 divided into 0 pieces. - makes no sense and thus = “undefined” (not “infinity”), [0 * ?nothing? = 31]
0/31 = 0 divided into 31 pieces - each piece is still zero, [31 * 0 = 0]
0/0 = 0 divided into 0 pieces - still makes no sense because it is “indeterminate”, [0 * ?anything? = 0]
Well … someone didn’t.
In hyperreal notation, those same numbers can be resolved because more information is within the notation. Each “0” has a degree of zero that it is, not merely an ambiguous nothing.
That is up to Phyllo to ask. He is making a asserting similar to mine, I want to cross examine it. Cross examining you doesn’t get me into a place of potentially grasping my own position better, I already know your wrong, what matters now is the specifics in how Phyllo is right.
This is a presumption One is always monistic. One is a Dyad is 2 and 1 simultaneously, but not three as the two states are presumptions of states of being and not actuality, so are not mutually in play upon the other simultaneously, by themselves.
No quantity divided “31” times is still no quantity …
Maybe you can be kind and call the latter a virtual or imaginary number to your stance. Regardless, dividing a lack of quantity 31 times does not create a quantity, not an undefined