Does this “boil” down to God not being able to off himself?
The most popular view among physicists is that the universe goes through a cyclical phase of every Big Bang being
followed by a Big Crunch and so on. And so while heat death can last for a very long time it is not actually infinite
Einstein, among many others disagree. But one serious issue is that such would imply a center to the universe. And that implies an absolute frame of reference, which refutes Relativity entirely.
There are other models : The Big Rip - The Big Freeze - Death Bubbles
All bogus.
The universe merely keeps changing as if an infinitely large cloud of black holes and galaxies absorbing each other, exploding, drifting, reforming, on and on, never larger nor smaller.
What happens when maximum entropy has been reached and there
is therefore insufficient energy available to perform any more work
Also once black holes stop absorbing matter they evaporate into radiation
They do not carry on expanding forever. That would be a violation of entropy
“The Law of Entropy” is not THE LAW.
Black holes would grow until all floating matter surrounding them was absorbed and then, if not sooner, they migrate toward each other gaining speed. When they eventually collide, they create more galaxies in a different location. Of course, they don’t all have the same timing, so some are still growing when others impact them.
The free radiation that they emit doesn’t make up for all of the matter they absorb (obviously, else they wouldn’t grow).
Dark energy is causing the space between galaxies to expand away from
each other in all directions so black hole collisions are far less probable
No. It is causing it to appear that way because light bends while going through uneven “dark matter” as well as gaining more red shift. You can’t tell how far things are apart merely by looking at them, nor simply by measuring from year to year.
Specifically, the galaxies cause a depletion of the matter between each other. And that causes a thinning of the energy/matter in those regions. The effect of that is that they appear to be further apart as the light is less and less affected. But eventually, they gain no more mass and merely drift toward each other. Actually they were always slightly drifting toward each other as they were absorbing matter.
And that is why you see some black holes spinning around each other and some merely drifting through space.
Particle physics. Ah the reason scientists tend to be androgynous. Its the notion of being surrounded by balls.
The term dark energy is a placeholder as it is not known what it is
Well, not by you.
Not by any physicist and they are the ones who should know not me
Is there a reason why YOU should not know??
Careful of worshiping the word of others: Nullius in Verba.
The following is necessarily true. And if genuinely interested can even be proven to you:
My apologies James. Lil’ syrup here is getting dangerously close to another incident of bobgun. And we don’t want another incident of that do we sweetie. Pets, and Sits you in a corner with a cute and little dunce cap.
I am sceptical of those who imply they know the truth and no one else
And so I shall take your advice and not worship those words as you say
Note that I offered to prove it “even to you”
… THAT is not “worship”.
But you prefer to merely let authority figures do your thinking for you (aka “worship”) … fine.
??
You aren’t referring to your bug-zapper thread, are you? Although I am sure that you couldn’t follow that debate, he only left because I shot down everything he said.
Assuming that the same methodology is being employed I fail to see what is the difference
I am not going to accept anything as true if I do not understand it even if it is actually true
Take it to people who know what they are talking about because I do not know any of this
In short: You are never going to actually understand anything, but rather merely meme whatever “they” say.
… fine. That hardly sets you apart from the majority non-thinkers.
Understanding does not only come from them but can come from anyone. So there is no conspiracy to
only listen to what they say. And I am actually more interested in diversity of opinion than in adopting
a dogmatic position. And I also have no problem at all in accepting that anything I know could be wrong