Let’s go a little bit further, for those that can handle it.
What the infant, child, teenager, and modern adult know of “Objectivity” is usually just another layer of subjectivism. This is how the infant learns to “trust” your mother and father. You believed in the thoughts, beliefs, and ideas of your parents, as an infant. And then in school, you learned and trusted in the ideas of your teacher. And then you trusted in your priest. And then your president. And then whatever else or whomever else convinced you throughout your life. But these are merely authorities and representatives. The average modern, human, goes from one authority to the next, another level and another (per)version of subjectivity.
Most humans stop after a certain point and become accustomed and comfortable with a certain “level of authority”. “That’s enough knowledge, wisdom, information, and intelligence for me,” the average person tells herself. This amount of knowing, or ignorance, is “good enough”. But nowhere along the way does the human escape from ‘subjectivity’. Because the new authority, the new priest, is not offering any “real objectivity” but merely another form of subjectivity.
This is why subjectivists always accuse one another of subjectivity. And this makes the majority of posts on this forum, from week to week, and year to year. You see it all the time. I can pick a majority of threads on this forum, and it’s one subjectivist squabbling with another subjectivist, about their respective subjectivity, and “how to interpret the unicorn in the corner”. That’s all this junk and garbage is.
At no point, do the subjectivists ever step “outside” the box, or even broach the walls. Subjectivity is not interested in a doorway, to step outside the room, and leave the humans and unicorn in the corner behind. Instead humanity is firmly focused on the unicorn in the corner. Inward, solipsistic, subjective, “open to opinion and debate”.
“Objectivity” begins when an individual truly questions, “is there a unicorn in the corner, or isn’t there???” What do your senses say? Is it there? Can you see it? Can you feel it? This is actually a difficult question, meanwhile, a human will continue to claim and insist, “YES I DO SEE IT!” and “YES I CAN FEEL IT!” Subjectivity is difficult to confront and argue with, rationally and reasonably, when it is locked inside such a delusion.
You cannot talk a psychotic out of her psychosis. It’s not a matter of “reasoning” with such madmen.
This is why the ‘priestly’ class of humans feel so motivated, and justified, to redirect the mass of humanity, to their own benefits and personal whims. If humans are firmly entrenched with the idea of the unicorn, and “make it real” with their minds, then why not use and abuse such humans? Why not treat them as cattle? Why not “dehumanize” humanity, when, such a phenomenon and society is not really ‘human’ in the first place? Or, isn’t it obvious by now, that belief and faith in the unicorn in the corner, makes any given person “human” in the first place?
Isn’t humanity that shared delusion? To believe in the unicorn in the corner is. to. be. human.