Think of Al Gore.
Controlled opposition creating the illusion of choice.
A Clinton affiliate.
Yes.
Neat video.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoI7KMJuQBw[/youtube]
She is megalomaniac.
It is a difference whether a heterosexual white man, a heterosexaul black man, a homosexual white man, a homosexual black man, a heterosexual white woman, a heterosexual black woman, a homosexual white woman, or a a homosexual black woman wants the war and says this publicly.
HaHaHa:Neat video.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoI7KMJuQBw[/youtube]
She is megalomaniac.
Who? Clinton?
If yes, agreed.
It is a difference whether a heterosexual white man, a heterosexaul black man, a homosexual white man, a homosexual black man, a heterosexual white woman, a heterosexual black woman, a homosexual white woman, or a a homosexual black woman wants the war and says this publicly.
Never underestimate the power of the vajay-jay[vagina]…
With a vajay-jay you can do a lot of things and get away with it.
With a vajay-jay you can be under criminal investigation by the F.B.I., warmonger, and run for president all at the same time simultaneously!
Arminius: HaHaHa:Neat video.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoI7KMJuQBw[/youtube]
She is megalomaniac.
Who? Clinton?
Yes.
Ha,Ha, Arminius! The unchanged German idealistic pessimism, Obviouly You are still stuck on Schopenhauer, Nietzche made no difference, shocking You out of Your complacency?
PS: if I hurt You in any way, pls. don’t worry, I meant that in a general , off brandish and reticent.
Ha,Ha, Arminius! The unchanged German idealistic pessimism, Obviouly You are still stuck on Schopenhauer, Nietzche made no difference, shocking You out of Your complacency?
You are wrong, Jerkey. The German Idealism is pure optimism. You named the German Schopenhauer (pessimistic) and the German Nietzsche (optimistic), okay, but both are no typical idealists.
PS: if I hurt You in any way, pls. don’t worry, I meant that in a general , off brandish and reticent.
If you are a fan of Clinton, then please don’t worry. I was only referring to facts. I am more a realist than an idealist. You should not confuse realism with pessimism.
Iraq threatening war with Turkey right now.
Iraq warns that it will take military action against Turkey if they do not withdraw their troops from their territory. This would get complicated since Turkey is a member of NATO. So who is on whose side? Is Turkey just abusing its NATO status to attack Russia for seven seconds of violating its air space when it has invaded a neighbor itself?
:-k
Armstrong Economics:Iraq warns that it will take military action against Turkey if they do not withdraw their troops from their territory. This would get complicated since Turkey is a member of NATO. So who is on whose side? Is Turkey just abusing its NATO status to attack Russia for seven seconds of violating its air space when it has invaded a neighbor itself?
Turkey is claiming that there is a Kurdish threat in northern Iraq.
Yes, the Kurdish threat has always been their “argument”, a straw man fallacy.
[url=http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/07/world/threats-responses-northern-iraq-for-kurds-big-menace-incursion-turks.html]THREATS AND RESPONSES: NORTHERN IRAQ; For Kurds, Big Menace Is an Incursion by Turks.
… Kurds from … are planning to form a human chain to block Turkish soldiers from entering Northern Iraq. … As Turkish military officials pushed for Parliament to reconsider whether to let American soldiersenter for a possible attack on Iraq, Kurdish protests intensified against deploying Turkish forces in a limited area of northern Iraq. …[/url]