And everything that I say is true within my own framework and system. Is there anyone who cannot say that?
It is a meaningless assertion merely giving the opportunity to throw in the word “Scientific”…
In contrast, the Abrahamic religions are convincing their reality is the right based on fears and threat of perdition. This really works and thus many Abrahamic believers denounced the theory of evolution and cling on to creationism.
Various groups are battling within the existing battlefields of ideologies, where one is trying to convince others their views of reality are the correct ones while those of others are wrong.
The EXACT same thing happens within science. You merely don’t get to hear it.
I believe the wise stance is to accept whatever net-positive so-claimed truths but as conditioned upon their respective ‘maps’ and ‘defined territories’. No truths should be claimed as absolute or as the only unconditional truth.
I don’t believe you know what you just said.
The greater the precision of the map the greater its representation of ‘ITS’ reality.
So you think that a map has its own reality??
How many realities do you image there to be? How many can be real at the same time?
True absolute reality is an impossibility.
Then how can you ever say that any proposed reality is false?
And try to realize that every time you say “impossible”, you are saying, “absolutely not possible”.
In a way ‘whatever I think about what reality is, reality is.’
That certainly explains why you think that you are always right.
How can anyone ever be wrong if reality itself is merely whatever they think it is? The only thing that Science can ever do is prove that a proposal is necessarily wrong. But if whatever someone thinks is necessarily true merely because they think it, what point is there in having Science?
It seems that all of those Muslims and Christians are necessarily right because reality depends merely on whatever their mind thinks. Or does that principle only apply to you?