Here’s an excerpt from a private conversation I recently had on Facebook (only from my side of the dialogue):
::
The mainstream religion is now secular humanism which is somehow believed to be supported by science.
Faith means different things for Protestants and Catholics.
Thomas More, for example, was a Humanist and a Catholic. He chose death over forced conversion to Anglicanism (a hybrid form of Protestantism and Catholicism). Protestantism, in which every man is his own priest, quite naturally leads to Humanism, where every man decides for himself what religion (if any) he practices.
I think sex (or “gender”) difference is the one to focus on these days. Controversial, but not like racism. I also think it’s (one of) the most fundamental natural human inequality/-ies. Men choosing to be “disposable”: that’s like a noble kind of martyrdom, which may actually regain men the respect they used to get.
Christianity can even be justified (historically) in this context. “Only creative reason, which in the crucified God is manifested as love, can really show us the way.” (Pope Ratzinger.) Is the voluntarily “disposable” male not the epitome of creative reason manifesting as love?
Yeah, Christianity is a major historical manifestation of “the Patriarchy”, man!
And it was the White Male Protestant who led the West (and thereby the globe) to secular humanism, feminism, etc.
All that can be seen as a great self-sacrifice by the “disposable” male–not to mention the white male…
The “disease” Liberal Protestantism can be construed as a noble self-misunderstanding. Men like us now realize that it’s an error, that the most beneficent act would consist of the reinstatement of Patriarchy.
A new Aryan subordination of the indigenous Goddess (Moody spoke of the Black Goddess counter to Graves’ White Goddess. I’ll try to find some of Moody’s posts on the Super-White-Man for you).
::
By “Aryan” I was also distinctly thinking of definitions like this one:
“Aryan - a civilized follower of Vedic culture; one whose goal is spiritual advancement.” (Prabhupada, Bhagavad-gita As It Is, Glossary.)
The division of the human race into males and females is of course much, much deeper than into the various races: the former antedates even the emergence of hominid species by far.
Here’s an excerpt from the thread of which I was especially thinking when I spoke of “some of Moody’s posts” etc. (the square brackets and typos are Moody’s own):
::
Goethe’s contention that the Feminine draws us upward is frequently ridiculed by Nietzsche. No, the dark-drives of White-Woman draw us down; the Superwhiteman [Zarathusra], disdaing the womanish, must climb to the solitary heights where the air is clear and all that is smells feminine and sphinxlike is far below.
The constant danger to the Higher White Man is actually related to the White Woman; it is this - that the Higher White Man may become extinct.
We know from Nietzsche that [White]Woman is a danger [immediate image of the blonde blue-eyed Lou von Salome] to the Super-White-Man.
The Zarathustran White Man is told endlessly by Nietzsche that he must seek solitude.
He takes his six solitudes [inbetween down-goings] before his final seventh solitude which is [White] Death.
Can you not see what a danger to the White Race this Solitude is?
How can the White Race be reproduced by its finest speciemens [SuperWhiteMen and Women] if the White Man has to flee the sphinxations of the White Woman!
And also, by her Darkness, White Woman actually flouts her Whiteness.
Disgust, disgust.
So the Zarathustrian Whiteman is in constant danger of being overwhelmed by the sheer numbers of the mediocre, the prodigeous and gregarious many-too-many. Hic niger est, as Nietzsche quotes from Horace.
To that end, what he calls the “hope of a Pure European Race” must be engendered by Eugenics.