The statement “all people are equal” is a juridical statement and means “all people are or should be equal before the law”, “people have or should have the same rights”. People are not really equal.
And that makes the Darwinistic Selection Principle True.
I’m glad you finally realised that.
Nonsense. ^^^^
You are not capable of understanding the simpliest sentences.
And this ^^^ also make Darwinism true!!
If youre trying to have kids and then even if you are rich dont manage because you are infertile? Are you then successful even if your rich? No. Bullnonsense.
I did not use the word “rich” in my opening post. You can be successful without being rich and rich without being successful. It depends on …
Just ask yourself:
- " Am I successful (and why or why not) ? "
- " Do I have kids (and why or why not) ? "
People without sentience should not have rights. However, the trouble is, we cannot prove whether or not a person has sentience or is a p-zombie.
A “p-zombie”?
You are still wrong.
No. You are wrong and have nothing to contribute to this thread. So, please, look for another thread.
Humans can live without any natural environment, because they can live in an artificial environment, which is made by themselves. They can live on their own “absolute islands” - thus: without any natural environment.
If you live in an artificial environment like the ISS, the natural environment is even deadly for you. An astronaut is immediately dead after leaving the ISS (artificial environment) without any other artificial environment (at least the astronaut suit).
I have no need to contribute to this idiotic thread, since you have offered nothing in defence of your ridiculous claim.
Actually he has proven his point several times over.
Oh, I have proven my point here - even several times. But (as I have said also several times here): You are obviously not capable of reading.
Do you know what I do, if I find a thread idiotic and claims ridiculous? I ignore that thread. So you are obviously lying here again, because you are always posting in this thread.
Go and look for another thread (as I have said also several times here to you).
Yes. Exactly.
And many others have contributed to this thread by supporting my proven point.
No.
What he has done is to find some examples where humans have progressed in ways he does not like. The fact remains that the principle remains that the more babies that survive to establish their traits, mean those traits persist in viable progeny.
Just because he does not like the result, makes no very difference.
The principle is in tact, and what he says not only relies on the principle, but his examples depend on that principle.
The real problem here is that neither you nor he, has the slightest clue about how evolution works.
It’s quite amusing!!
And only 20% agree with you.
65% do not and the rest are honest enough to not know, or not care what the hell you are on about!!
You are obsessed.
If I really had disliked the result, then I would not have made the poll. I have expected that result, because I know that most ILP members (including you, of course) believe in nonsense. I do not care much whether I belong to a minority or to a majority.
Your false gods and their religions are dead.
God is still dead.
And so is your brain