This is already more than one line. So that in and of itself disqualifies him as mature and serious philosopher. Right, One Liner?
Thanks, Turd. That allows me to segue to this: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=189516
Feel free, One Liner, to contribute. You know, one line at a time.
I don’t capitalize it. Satyr and Turd do. And I am quick to point out that, pertaining to the overwhelming preponderance of human interactions, dasein [as I understand it] is not in the least bit relevant.
Indeed, and going back [so far] to the Big Bang. Or [perhaps] going all the way back to Turd’s rendition of God.
He is a Catholic, right Turd?
On the other hand, of late, Satyr does not appear to know much at all. Or, if he does, he does not appear interested in sharing it with folks at KT. His lectures are now down to a trickle. In fact, he hasn’t posted anything in days.
Summer vacation perhaps?
Note to others:
Why is it that – sooner or later – I manage to reduce the particularly feckless objectivists [of Satyr’s ilk] down to intellectual glop like this?
They bitch and they moan about the lack of mature and serious philosophy here but what they seem particularly in a huff and a puff about is that others refuse to think about, say, everything in exactly the same manner as they do.
And by everything I mean this: anything.
Go ahead, One Liner, engage Turd in a discussion. Respond substantively [if only one line at a time] to one of his threads.
Let us peruse the predictable result when you actually dare to suggest that he is wrong about something.
And by something I mean this: anything.
In fact, I challenge you!