Like a souless factory automated line, reproducing the same drivel without change.
Iām dead serious, very good chance he is a Alice Bot, a attempt by Microsoft to make a sentient artificial debaterā¦ one they stopped funding but forgot to turn off, left to wander the wastelands of the internet saying Daseinā¦ Daseinā¦ Daseinā¦ a virus without sentience, proclaing a authentic vision of consciousness.
Fewer concepts are more ironic and fucked up than this. Donāt tell me God doesnāt have a twisted sense of humorā¦ as Satyr Knows
Have you ever seen the cognitive explanations for how that shit is supposed to work. It is some of the most bizarre stuff Iāve seenā¦ Iāve seen a lot over the years, it is when you see people explain the neurology of it to people who donāt get it, itās like WTF. Is that supposed to be the brain of a cow or bat or dolphin or some shit? Not human.
Some floating around on Reddit like sites, explaining it to the unenlighted. Everyone starts calling bullshit, but they refuse to give in and just say they donāt get it.
Maybe they didnāt draw the shit with vibrant enough colored crayons, donāt know what they think is the reason nobody gets the explanations they offer for how Dasein works. Not my first stroll around for a theory on how cognition works.
Feel free, One Liner, to contribute. You know, one line at a time.
I donāt capitalize it. Satyr and Turd do. And I am quick to point out that, pertaining to the overwhelming preponderance of human interactions, dasein [as I understand it] is not in the least bit relevant.
Indeed, and going back [so far] to the Big Bang. Or [perhaps] going all the way back to Turdās rendition of God.
He is a Catholic, right Turd?
On the other hand, of late, Satyr does not appear to know much at all. Or, if he does, he does not appear interested in sharing it with folks at KT. His lectures are now down to a trickle. In fact, he hasnāt posted anything in days.
Summer vacation perhaps?
Note to others:
Why is it that ā sooner or later ā I manage to reduce the particularly feckless objectivists [of Satyrās ilk] down to intellectual glop like this?
They bitch and they moan about the lack of mature and serious philosophy here but what they seem particularly in a huff and a puff about is that others refuse to think about, say, everything in exactly the same manner as they do.
And by everything I mean this: anything.
Go ahead, One Liner, engage Turd in a discussion. Respond substantively [if only one line at a time] to one of his threads.
Let us peruse the predictable result when you actually dare to suggest that he is wrong about something.
Dude, just accept your a Objectivist and move on. Iām certain he more than likely called you one by now. Everyone except AImbigious is a Objectivist, even when he is one (which is usually the case). You will always be in the wrong. He will always be the underdog proving himself right to his adoring audience, whoever the fuck they are.
And to think that all I ever really wanted is for Turd to admit that he is in way over his head when the discussion shifts from Nihilism as an intellectual contraption to nihilism as āfor all practical purposesā an actual thing ā reflected in the behaviors that we choose ā here on the ground.
Instead, ādown hereā I thumped him time and again.
And now [as with Satyr] his only recourse is to make me ādisappearā from his life. That way he doesnāt have to be troubled by the points I raise at all.
And, sure, I have to admit itās a pretty effective strategy. =D>
Is he saying dasein, dasein, dasein again? Just ignore him, half the site has him on ignore, for never making coherent, meaningful statements. I honestly doubt if he exists, or is just a copy & paste preprogrammed Alice Bot saying meaningless drivel in response to questions he isnāt capable of understanding in response. A lot of huffing and puffing on his part. Ask Satyr, he knows.