Contrary to what you maniacs believe regarding your gross assumption making, I have no intentions, nor have I ever had any intentions on embarking on any rape sprees, murder sprees or anything else of such a nature. Nor do i believe in hurting anyone at all, the only two exceptions would be self-defense, there i think it is only reasonable to respond in such a way as a preventive measure, but even then not to transgress the boundaries of the situation and go overboard, my reaction is relative to the degree of threat…and the other is by law, as a punishment, but that would be committed by a legit executioner.
As far as the act of rape in the civilized world, I fully agree to the prohibition of it and it’s full consequence, i would even go one step further and implement the death penalty, as long as the law regarding rape is specifically defined…this law would not include:
-
Women who intentionally intoxicate themselves, flirtatious with a stranger and willingly go back to his house…
-
Women who agree to sex then change their mind’s after the act…
-
Women accusing her own husband of raping her…(unless there is clear signs of domestic violent abuse, then it can be considered to a degree)
and everything else where they try to create themselves as victims of so-called rape…you get the idea…
and this law would only be applied under a patriarchy.
By the way, these women trivialize real rape victims and this trivialization will only reduce the punishment of rape… then you also must factor in false rape allegations which also trivializes rape and the victim’s suffering.
I would also add the death penalty for the false rape allegations, depending upon the woman’s mental health, however, if it is under malicious intent to destroy the other person’s life, then the punishment will be applied.
And for clarity purposes, nobody is negating the impact of rape, i was simply arguing the natural occurrence of it outside of the emotionalized mind. Just because something is naturally occurring doesn’t necessarily make it acceptable by modern society. You are doing yourself a great injustice to deny the natural reality of it, but clearly among you lot, it isn’t legitimately denied, it’s ignored strategically as an indirect means of social selection between men, applying the altruism to a man who adheres to the standards of women, and disgust, wimp, sleazy etc to men who don’t adhere…
“Rape” is used as a method of selection of identification, the objective in this context is pure promotion for women’s control, leaning on emotion for it’s appeal, the gravity of impact, to increase selection methods through victim status… which is what Arc is doing with her “wall of text”, because she has nothing else to hold up her position…so out of desperation she jumps for the dramatic appeal…which does not negate the premise of the argument…because, for her, it isn’t about reality…it’s about control, idealistic delusion, misandry, extreme egoistic hedonism, emotionalized artificiality, naivety, systemic seduction, social life direction…
It’s a good thing the death penalty was removed when increasing secular law was implemented, with the promotion of female power, freedom and access to society…giving the nature of women, as the system typically expected their social influence can get incredibly dangerous, where if such law existed today the way it did back then, there would be a great deal of dead men, due to the stupidity of women…
You can already see this stupidity arising everywhere…where they try to redefine rape to whatever they want, accusing all men of committing the act of rape during sex whether they realize it or not, picking and choosing who is a rapist and who isn’t even after consented sex…now put women in charge, reestablish the death penalty for rape…and you can see where this goes…
Then you will also have the opposite who will protest against the death penalty, so they can maintain the victim status and it’s social leverage, this is why they try to redefine the definition of rape into ambiguity, keeping it loose, expanding the spectrum of victimhood so they can reach further levels of society as a method of staying relevant, inside the picture, deriving the social value attached to an event, increasing their focal point of significance as a form of identity where they unify as a collective, including the women who empathize with the so called victim, as if she is the victim herself, trauma by association…
it’s how they bond around the fire…you know…