Have you experienced frustration with nature, because of the knowledge of pattern and context - essentially, that context is why things like trees and fields can have power over us?
Raised on a farm and in a forest, my boyhood knew first-hand adventures with nature. As a child I was “at-one” with nature. I look back on those days with nostalgia–days when I was barefoot and blessed.
What do you think the meaning of being “at one” with nature is? Is it programming, or is it proof that programming as a concept isn’t the essence of reality?
But reality is concepts. Reality is formula, and context. I’m asking about the link between life gravitating towards forests and nature and the existence of concepts and programming. If nature is exposed, it can lose its value, but is this reality true? Does nature have value in the first place to be lost?
It is what it is. When you value something, you form neurons that mirror it’s image. And you think about it alot.
The more neurons associated with that, the more you value it.
That all subjects of any country get identified by CNN or BBC as trees and planets; people including the current rebels in Turkey, or the fans of the MCU, or anyone who’s ever visited a nightclub, or worked in any industry etc. Just anyone.