One big idea is missing in Physics.

If it were binary you’d have no difficulty is visualising the whole thing as patterns of that, just like upscaling or downscaling a bitmap image. Here the universe is doing the same thing, but the patterns aren’t binary, so you inject the idea of fractals when the repetition is actually by a different maths. Things in patterns tend towards repetition because all patterns are cyclic. It is clear that atomic, microscopic and macroscopic objects are observably different. So scale does not just repeat cycles endlessly [is fractalic], each scale denoted different behaviours and effects.

They’re brilliant for cleaning carpets, for a start.

Brief characteristic of Vacuum: T=0K.
===…
1.
It was, it is, it will be forever an infinite /eternal continuum T=0K.
The Material World began its existence and evolution from T=0K.
2.
Today physicists think that the Universe as whole has temperature:
T= 2,7K. They know very well that parameter T=2,7K is not constant.
It is temporal and goes down and in the future it will come to T= 0K.
But they don’t know what to do with infinite T=0K and therefore
banned T=0K from logical thought.
3.
T=0K is not empty / void infinite continuum.
The void/vacuum T=0K gives birth to an infinite numbers of
virtual particles (antiparticles, dark matter , dark energy and “zoo”
of elementary particles) and they exist in this Kingdom of Vacuum.
4.
Question:
Which geometrical form can have virtual particles (antiparticles,
dark matter , dark energy and “zoo” of elementary particles)
in the absolute reference frame T= 0K ?

The answer is: “They must be flat particles.”
Why?
Because absolute endless infinite void - vacuum T=0K obeys the
laws of “Ideal Gas” and therefore . . . according to Charle’s law
(and the consequence of the third law of thermodynamics) as the
thermodynamic temperature of a system approaches absolute zero
the volume of particles approach zero too.
It means the particles at T=0K must have flat forms.
The most ideal flat geometrical form is form of circle: pi= c /d =3,14 . . . .
These circle –particles are without thickness. It means, we cannot reach
the T=0K and we cannot reach the density of these vacuum-particles.
We cannot observe vacuum - particles with tools, but thanks to
mathematics (physical-mathematical laws) we can understand their
real geometrical forms.

The “strings particles” is also flat particles and don’t have thickness.
But to be “string” is needed forces in two different sides.
Without forces the “string” will take form of circle.
And in circle all forces in all different directions are equal and
therefore the circle–particle is in an ideal equilibrium (potential) state.
Such equilibrium-potential state can be changed easily with a
thin/weak quantum force.
Once again.
Circle-particle says to string-particles: “I am, circle, the real quantum
particle and my existence is confirmed by physical-mathematical laws
and you, string, don’t have such laws, such confirmation. You are only
private invention of theoretical thought.”
5.
When very small changes appear in absolute void of “Ideal Gas”
( T=0K ) something was happened. Pressures, densities,
temperatures were changed and can be observed.
(Casimir effect, vacuum polarization, Lamb shift, . . …etc.)
These “very small changes” are Quantum changes.
These very small Quantum changes ( h and h*bar) make great
difference in the Kingdom of Absolute Vacuum and Nature.
====. . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
=============…
absolute zero.jpg

They suck.

I question this law. I don’t see a law, but a rough correlation…
The volume of particles tends to decrease due to law of averages…nothing more.
It is my belief that it is simply associated with the behavior, not linked. I think you need to go back to Square 1.
Heat is just because molecules vibrate. There is no flattening of any kind involved in super cool areas, simply due to larger volume of particles, they tend to bounce with each other more due to law of averages, and so retain their heat energy longer…eventually they start to leave and move to lower pressure zones…thus less hot molecules ricocheting within the bounds, and thus less heat. No pancaking needed.

someone by name NAMETA 9 has kind of interesting stuff about this theory.
where is that fellow now.

First of all there has to be the big question: Is there an “infinite void - the vaccuum”?

Oh come on folks…

We’ve already been through this!!!

The lack of all existents includes itself…

So it would be the lack of the lack of all existents …

That is why existence exists…

Basic set theory

One Sisyphus project in modern Physics.
=====…
Scientists try to unify four fundamental forces:
electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity.
a)
In 1979 the Nobel Prize was awarded to physicists who
merged electromagnetic and the weak nuclear forces in a single
framework: electroweak theory.
b)
Uniting the strong force with the electroweak picture has not been easy.
However, many physicists believe that at very high energies, the
electroweak and the strong forces would behave as one.
That unification is known as the search for a “grand unified theory”
c)
The theory that may finally include all four fundamental forces as one
(electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) is known as the search
for a “theory of everything”.
============…
My opinion.
So, on a large macro cosmic scale scientists gathered all masses and
energies into “ singular point” and on a micro scale this picture repeat
itself when scientists try to merge all four forces at very high
energies as one.
I call this scientific plan to understand micro world as a “Sisyphus project”.
Why?
Because behavior of particles at very high energies was explained
by Paul Dirac in 1928. According to Dirac at a “sea of vacuum”
quantum particles (forces) will be changed into virtual particles
with negative energy / mass: -E= Mc^2. (!)
This “sea of vacuum” is infinite continuum and it is some kind of
infinite energy and it is full with infinite numbers of particles: –E=Mc^2.
From these Dirac’s negative particles the creation and evolution of
existence was started. From Dirac’s “sea of vacuum” and negative particles
of energy / mass -E= Mc^2 “the theory of everything” begins its way.
====…
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
===…

You can test and understand scientific plan to unify all four forces
(electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) at very high energies
into one singular force in your home conditions:
a) take four eggs ,
b) break them,
c) make omelet with homogeneous structure,
d) try to understand, what chicken is.

Good appetite, and remember,
in our eggs – our forces (more than four).
=====…

To have an omelet takes an outside energy source to make it happen.
Exactly in this way the physicists work.
They use outside energy and deep vacuum (LHC) to create
new quantum particles.
They don’t think about nature of energy itself.
As Feynman said:
“ It is important to realize that in physics today,
we have no knowledge of what energy is.
We do not have a picture that energy comes in little
blobs of a definite amount.”
============…
Again.
LHC needs deep vacuum and high energy to create new tiny
quantum particles. If LHC is model of the Universe then the
absolute vacuum T=0K with infinite energy can also create
tiny quantum particles: -E=Mc^2.
And . . . if LHC isn’t model of the Universe (!) . . .
. . then . . . why we need this big machine.
===========…
LHC.jpg

It is not true what certain physicists say: “the vacuum is nothing, and nothing is not nothing, so that something can be created out of nothing, the vacuum”. It is not true, because it is impossible - by definition.

All what physicists may get in that case is a linguistic change, thus a new meaning of the word “nothing” which leads to a new meaning of physics and other science sectors, to a new belief, a new religion, a new theology, a new philosophy. That is what they want, because they want what their rulers want them to want. Physicists and other scientists depend on politico-economic rulers because of the research funds, thus: money.

So at last science will completely lose its meaning.

Worse than that, the very idea of a “force” is a superstition. :sunglasses:

“Although we are used to thinking of empty space as containing
nothing at all, and therefore having zero energy, the quantum
rules say that there is some uncertainty about this. Perhaps each
tiny bit of the vacuum actually contains rather a lot of energy.
If the vacuum contained enough energy, it could convert this
into particles, in line with E= Mc^2.”
/ Book: Stephen Hawking. Pages 147-148.
By Michael White and John Gribbin. /

Then it would not be nothing.

It would not be nothing.

Book: This will make you smarter.
Part: The name game. By Stuart Firrestein.
=.
" Too often in science we operate under the principle that ’ to name it is to tame it’,
or so we think. One of the easiest mistakes, even among working scientists, is to
believe that labeling something has somehow or other added to an explanation or
understanding of it. Worse than that, we use it all the time when we’re teaching,
leading students to believe that a phenomenon named is a phenomenon known,
and that to know the name is to know the phenomenon." / Page 62./

" Even words that, like ‘gravity’ seem well settled may lend more of an aura
to an idea than it deserves. . . . . .
And still, today, physicists do not have a clear understanding of what
gravity is or where it comes from, even though its effect can be described
quite accurately". / Page 64/
===…

"the vacuum is nothing, and nothing is not nothing”

The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao
The name that can be named is not the eternal name
The nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth
The named is the mother of myriad things
Tao Te Ching
taoism.net/ttc/chapters/chap01.htm
E=mc2.png

Very true.

And “nothing” has been named, although the vacuum untamed.

Gravity is merely space on a slippery slope.

Yes. Full agreement.