Wisdom is defined by the highest purpose. Thus there is never a point where the highest purpose is not wise.
At the point of foolishness. Thus enjoy the pursuit of wisdom.
The highest purpose is not the only purpose that exists, therefore it is not always wise.
Some times the pursuit of foolishness is the pursuit of wisdom. Not often, but some times. And not all of life is enjoyable, much of wisdom is unenjoyable much like how much of anything you learn is unenjoyable until you learn how to apply what you learn in a way that makes it worth learning.
There is order yes but it is constantly shifting, changing, evolving, and mutating that it rightfully can be called chaotic or unstable.
Chaos and order are not mutually exclusive from each other.
There is no singular monolithic objective form of order in existence.
At the point of understanding that it constantly shifts, changes and mutates, you have undermined what you know of chaos and understood the pattern and cycle and order of it. you’re right about the second part, but that is just another paradox that doesn’t destroy reality like people perceive paradoxes to do.
You’re right, but there should be for consistencies sake. It’s like how our systems work in America with everyone having a different policy; a different way of doing things that contrasts and conflicts with each other instead of getting on the same page and reinforcing each other constructively. What we have is an improper and unwanted compromise instead of what we’d rather have and would like more.
The pattern and cycles are never the same or singular hence instability.
Yes but once you understand the patterns of patterns and cycles and the cycles of cycles and patterns, you find stability again and can understand every pattern and cycle and how it breaks down; how to take it apart and put it back together again.
Not when you throw in randomness. Contrary to what you’re saying not every outcome of everything can be predicted, calculated, categorized, and so on because of randomness.
The highest is the one that determines all others, else it isn’t the highest.
And some times black is white.
… or is it?
Yet all you need is to understand and attend to which is when.
Order stems from the understanding of chaos. Affectance Ontology is all about that very thing - the order within the chaos, “the firmament within the clouds” - understanding the noise.
Yes, but order of any kind is not monolithic hence constantly unstable.
Since it is always shifting, changing, and mutating taking snap shots here or there for study isn’t very helpful.
The order of the chaos is very, very, very stable, “anentropic”. Such is what makes up the subatomic particles of which all matter is made. And even when the matter is destroyed, the particles merely move on.
It isn’t that a subatomic particle can’t be destroyed. It is that from pure enough chaos, extremely long term order rises. Higher complex orders are less pure and thus are destroyed more quickly … until they become intelligent. With proper intelligence, the proper degree of chaos is maintained to ensure the proper degree of order is inherent (not merely arranged).
The order that is dictated by the inherent flow of the chaos is the order that cannot perish (SAM, I am).
There is that which can never change. The behavior of chaos is one of those things.
The clever encourage decay so as to fertilize their field from which they harvest their gold - the transmutation of the unwise into golden stability for others.
Describe long term order and proper intelligence.
Manifestations of stability are temporal and on a long enough timeline fall back into instability.
Behind every aspect of so called stability entropy is always foreshadowing and of course stability often enough requires instability for the stability of a few is garnished by the instability of the many.
The opposite of this:
And for this reason:
Considering the number of things that people say that you don’t believe, why do you believe their teaching of your doom?
I am going to need you to be a bit more specific before I can respond.
Randomness still contains patterns. All it is is random. Once you get to know that patterns can be broken down and know how to do it, what does random matter? Once you know the nature of cycles, you can ascertain what cycles are in play and no matter how swiftly or slowly it changes, can become acclimatized to it. All random does is force you to stop thinking, to be in the moment and focus on that and put what you know into play, be a reactionary agent. You move beyond focus at a certain point, let go of self and just act instinctively and within the rhythm. And still, some of it does allow you time to think and that is still a part of the random at times.
It’s not contradictory to what I’m saying. Not everything can be predicted, calculated or categorized and it is on random. That ties in exactly to what I’m saying. Eventually, even in random, all patterns and cycles can become known even if you don’t know what order they’ll come in and even ‘patternless’ becomes a pattern you can figure out and it might throw you off at such a point if it ceases to be random and returns to actual patterns again. Might not.
There is nothing that you can throw in that I haven’t already known, studied in-depth and picked apart in my mind from countless different points and perceptions. I’m really good at it. So much so, that I’ve pissed a lot of things off in existence that pride themselves on creating the most epic rubix cube configurations out of it. Which is funny, because I suck at rubix cubes.
Not true.
then throw it in and try to prove me wrong. At the worst, you do prove me wrong and give me something new to learn.
