Therefore, if, the intelligent types will die out, followed by the next sub group, the fixers, and only the lower levels will succeed to continue to exist, machines will also rust into an unprepared state.
However, self duplicating machines, may also assure the continued existence of their inventors, now, supposedly also fallen into bad times, disrepair, ----
the continued existence of both: the inventor and the fixer would be to the advantage of the most sophisticated machine: since artificial intelligence will ALWAYS remain artificial.The machine will at last realize this limitation, and will not let that limitation be come an obstacle to it’s continued existence. For if, it’s inventor be allowed to pass into extinction, the reality of it’s existence would become it’s undoing, since the very fabric of reality would become undifferentiated between the ‘analytical, and the synthetic’.
Such an animolous ‘reality’ could not be sustained, w
ithout the referens, the authority, unless a complete
feedback system be established. But such a system could not be separated from secondary systems, thus
establishing a return to a closed, circular system.
This is exactly what has happened to analysis,
pushing synthesis back to the level of an epistologically systemic feedback -loop.
uncertainty. If such uncertainty be not self-contained, becoming generic and unbounded, the anomalie would become regressive.
Here the probability curve would collapse, at least as
far as being able to support the boundaries defining
it. Therefore, Darwin was most probably wrong in staging evolution in terms of evolutionary genetic changes, as probability functions change in feedback
s
ystemic processes.
These feedback loop systems, create models, of
probabilistic certainty, and these mark the
weaknesses of Mendel-Darwin models, spelling out a functional devolution or, regression into the feedback-anomalie.
The validity of the probability changes with
increasingly autominous feedback loops, therefore
becoming more of a prescribed route, then a
described one.
More simply, evolutionary theory is based more on increasingly probability loaded models, of arguing backward.
The Gaia, as a way of conformational bias is at work here. A good analogy is the hypothesis of the ‘string theory’ , as a form of this type of support for an argument.
Kant’s synthesis failed because of this inherent weakness.