We’re no longer together. I am single again. Anyways…
Don’t feel like being raped and murdered any time soon, so stay out West. In fact, I’ll pay you to not.
Are you playing on the word “penetrating”?
Move to the east coast then?
I need some extra crash. Will you pay me?
I live out West too, but in Canada (which means you’ll have to pay me double to stay up North).
When they’re willing to pay you do the direct opposite. It’s an invitation man.
$0.01 HHH, Gib your a tough cookie, $0.02
Shit, you call that a negotiation?
… Gib your a tough cookie, $0.02
Now we’re talking! That’s 2.5 cents Canadian!
US rates apply, sorry.
US rates apply, sorry.
That’s it, I’m crossing the border.
Jeez, give a guy an inch and he wants to cover thousands of miles.
Of the 925 single women surveyed, 75 percent said they’d have a problem with dating someone without a job. Only 4 percent of respondents asked whether they would go out with an unemployed man answered “of course.”
“Not having a job will definitely make it harder for men to date someone they don’t already know,” Irene LaCota, a spokesperson for It’s Just Lunch, said in a press release. “This is the rare area, compared to other topics we’ve done surveys on, where women’s old-fashioned beliefs about sex roles seem to apply.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/unemployed-men-survey-its-just-lunch_n_1631289.html
On the other hand, the prospect of dating an unemployed woman was not a problem for nearly two-thirds of men. In fact, 19 percent of men said they had no reservations and 46 percent of men said they were positive they would date an unemployed woman.
http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/2753-dating-unemployed-men-women.html
Most women still prefer to marry a man who earns more money than they do and would stay at home with their children if they could afford it, according to a survey published yesterday.
Despite years of equality campaigning and advances for women in the workplace, 64 per cent said they aspire to find a husband who brings home a larger pay packet than they do. None wanted to marry a man who earned less.
And 69 per cent said they would prefer to stay at home to look after their children if money were not an issue.
Only 19 per cent wanted their other half to be better educated than they are. Instead 62 per cent said they wanted a man to have the same level of intellect.
Thirty-one per cent thought they were better educated than their other halves, while 19 per cent thought their husbands were better educated.
The survey follows controversial research published last week by Dr Catherine Hakim of the London School of Economics, which claimed more women are choosing to ‘marry up’ by picking wealthy men for their spouse than in the 1940s. In her report, published by the Centre for Policy Studies think-tank, she said men dominate the top positions because women do not want careers in business.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvYyGTmcP80[/youtube]
Unbelievable !
No one of them is a real woman, and no one of them is a real man.
And it is also because of them that something like the following is possible.
- infowars.com/berlin-cologne- … rman-city/
- express.co.uk/news/world/631 … ck-Assault
- infowars.com/berlin-cologne- … rman-city/
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvYyGTmcP80[/youtube]
You know, I’ve gotta say, I kinda feel sorry for this girl. She must feel devastated today knowing she’s become this icon for male chauvinists to use in mocking feminists.
Yeah, sure, she’s angry, she’s bitchy, and I certainly wouldn’t want to hand her my balls on a silver platter, but so what? Who doesn’t get angry? Nobody’s even asking the question: Why is she angry? And isn’t it obvious from the video?
Furthermore, nobody’s drawing any attention to what she’s actually saying. If you listen to what she’s saying in the video, it doesn’t sound all that bad. That feminists are striving to abolish alimony, for example, doesn’t sound that bad. That feminists don’t want men to lose custody of their children, for example, doesn’t sound that bad.
Oh, and this girl:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF_wwIjBxNM[/youtube]
Yeah, she cut off her husband’s penis (I guess)–but apparently, according to her, he would leave the house for days without letting her know, was an alcoholic and drug abuser, was having affairs with other women, and was abusive in every which way–mentally, physically, emotionally (she didn’t mention sexually)–and one day she snapped. ← Well, that kinda dampens any scorn or rage one might have for her. At least it does for me.
When you realize this is the background she’s coming from, it doesn’t seem that bigoted that a room full of women would cheer for her.
Just sayin’.
HaHaHa:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvYyGTmcP80[/youtube]
You know, I’ve gotta say, I kinda feel sorry for this girl. She must feel devastated today knowing she’s become this icon for male chauvinists to use in mocking feminists.
Yeah, sure, she’s angry, she’s bitchy, and I certainly wouldn’t want to hand her my balls on a silver platter, but so what? Who doesn’t get angry? Nobody’s even asking the question: Why is she angry? And isn’t it obvious from the video?
Furthermore, nobody’s drawing any attention to what she’s actually saying. If you listen to what she’s saying in the video, it doesn’t sound all that bad. That feminists are striving to abolish alimony, for example, doesn’t sound that bad. That feminists don’t want men to lose custody of their children, for example, doesn’t sound that bad.
Oh, and this girl:
HaHaHa:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF_wwIjBxNM[/youtube]
Yeah, she cut off her husband’s penis (I guess)–but apparently, according to her, he would leave the house for days without letting her know, was an alcoholic and drug abuser, was having affairs with other women, and was abusive in every which way–mentally, physically, emotionally (she didn’t mention sexually)–and one day she snapped. ← Well, that kinda dampens any scorn or rage one might have for her. At least it does for me.
When you realize this is the background she’s coming from, it doesn’t seem that bigoted that a room full of women would cheer for her.
Just sayin’.
Are you a feminist, Gib?
Are you a feminist, Gib?
When feminists ask me: “Do you support respect and dignity for women?” I always answer “Yes.” ← Then they say: “Then you’re a feminist.”
But when I start a sentence: “I think women…” they say “Sexist!”
Think of me as someone who likes to see the human being underneath the “ist”.
Arminius:Are you a feminist, Gib?
When feminists ask me: “Do you support respect and dignity for women?” I always answer “Yes.” ← Then they say: “Then you’re a feminist.”
The one who supports recpect and dignity for woman is not necessarily a feminist yet. Every normal human would answer to that questioin with “yes”. So that question is a rhetorical question, if asked by a feminist. In other words: Answers to that question, if asked by a feminist, are not valid.
But when I start a sentence: “I think women…” they say “Sexist!”
And then? Do you respond then?