I think he mostly despises you cause your a piece of shit.
However, Carleas knows about as much about philosophy as he does the law, which is very little, and has a proven track record for doing the wrong thing purely out of spite and moderator solidarity. I have seen Ucci adapt his position out of being reasoned with, and conservative politics, especially constitutional, does involve having a historical understanding.
He was likely not as well read in the history of philosophy, and doesn’t realize your methods, which dramatically predate you by the way, is inherently antagonistic to any form of Rules of Order.
If you go back to the times of Marcus Aurelius (prior to him becoming Emperor) Cynic and Stoic Philosophers were entering into the Roman Senate while in session, denouncing people on a similar basis, noting their character traits made them unvirtous, and thus unqualified to be a Senator. This oftentimes resulted in death for the accusers.
This resurfaced during debates about free speech in the US, we oftentimes faced unwarranted censorship, a modern example today would be of the type I give for Magsj for her past actions. Its the kind that the Turkish State today is launching against the free press in Turkey… Turkey uses some of the very same claims this site uses to squash debates, their favorite is Ad Homming the president… the Zinnati’s and Magsj’s in Turkey is using it to commit genocide on the Kurds within Turkey, as well as to cover up supplying ISIS.
I think your at the point where the classical aspects of philosophy are on a literary level starting to override your traditional methods of presentation. Its likely because many Anatlrchist inevitably look back to ancient Cynic movements… you’ve likely seen the style presented several times without knowing it… you yourself acknowledge your opposed to money, as they were. Your thread here points out wealthy women are behaving contrary to suppositions in feminism, it puts at strain economics and what is natural… again, a common Cynic position. Is the behavior of the rich natural, or contrived? To what extent is feminism painted with this double standard? How does it effect our concept of “Natural Laws”… are all drives to Equality warranted, or are some systems too abstract, farcical, a hindrance to true equality and detrimental to the clarification of truth in subject?
Nastiness of style was also quite commonplace in Cynic presentation, they didn’t put on airs unless it was to force a farce, and reverse it to make a point. Very few people are going to go out of their way to claim your not a shithead, but us a philosopher required to put on airs and act unnatural?
Anwser is obviously no.
You most certainly have a place in that forum in particular. I don’t think Ucci necessarily agrees with your style, largely because he isn’t familiar with it’s historical formulas, which you stuck to in a surprising orthodox fashion… if anyone asks me “What is Cynicism” I may very well point to that thread… it’s a excellent example.
I think as time goes by, Ucci will start seeing the connections between these forms and modern methods. The end result historically was that philosophers practicing this form of philosophy were given immunity from punishments. In Christian states not only were they given immunity from prosecution, but often saint status, with feast days and icons. It was especially important in Russia, it’s what is making challenging Pussy Riot by Putin so damn difficult, the same logic they give to orthodox holy fools… at least one a national hero for saving a Tsar, applies to them as well. In the west we mostly know it through court jesters… who oftentimes were the only ones free to speak. Oddly enough, Church of Satan tries this method too (can’t wait till the older Christian varient finally clashes with them). We wouldn’t have the depth and complexity to our first amendment rights, French Philosophy never would of taken off… the French did deep analysis of Cynicism in philosophy and literature from the 16th century on.
Your method here is very, very firmly embedded in the philosophical tradition. At least in this regards. You would have to find a pretty extreme Gnostic sect of Cynics putting emphasis on the apocalypse for your violent tendencies, but most of the rest of your thought is firmly rooted in the philosophical system of Cynicism as it evolved. If Ucci opposes itc then he opposes Conservatism, opposes the constitution, countless court rulings on free speech, countless playwrites from antiquite to modern times, INCLUDING Volitare and Shakesphere, and quite frankly hates America.
Thats how deeply embedded you are with that thread, as it was when I last saw it. If he came to know this, I don’t think he would hesitate to move it back. It differs from how he approaches society and ethics, but is none the less a very well documented tradition at the core of expression, debating, how we think. Its not aimed at being amicable, but disruptive and daring, forcing a reconsideration of our opinions under trying circumstance, in the moment.
A reporter couldn’t put a microphone to a politicians face with a challenging, embarrassing question without these precedents. And no, there is no wiggle room, no (not so) clever logical wiggle out of this, looking at thing with eyes mostly closed and blurred through our eyelashes, only seeing what we want to see, leaving it at that… your simply put far too embedded in tradition with this one, this is more or less a dictionary definition of a overstep.
Given how common dictatorship over free expression is becoming in the west… with Turkey killing it’s own citizens because they decided to vote for the wrong party, Europe suppressing free speech, causing a explosion of violence with the migrants (government refused to hear the people), we should definitely make a stand here and insist free speech should be enforced. We need opposing opinions, even when offensive or designed by evident shitheads as yourself, to speak up. Your the test, if we can see guys like you can freely express themselves, then we know others of every stripe can too. It encourages competitive philosophy, and competitive ideas in philosophy. When we turn our backs on guys like you, in allowing you to express yourself, we only wound ourselves.
God Bless You, you sick, demented little pervert. Keep up the good fight.