Video doesn’t explain what magnetism is, I already know what domains are. I want to know why the flux goes through non-ferrous materials without interfering or being interefered.
If affectance aggregates planets, why do the planets only aggregate on one side, and why does their form remain flawless, if aether is getting jumbled and congested inside of it.
Damn James you really got him with that “bs” you totally won the argument.
Oh. Well THEY don’t know what magnetism is other than merely some magic (where the name came from) that causes attraction or repulsion of other magnets. They know that the molecules align so as to allow it to happen and that it has to do with orbiting electrons (except for the quantum magi who want to claim some magical magnetism particle).
As far as I can tell, I am the only person who has explained exactly why magnetism works. But I don’t have the videos that you specified.
I don’t know what any “aether” might be doing. And I don’t know what you mean by “on one side”. If you mean to ask why they migrate in only one direction, that would be because they migrate toward the stronger surrounding field, which is in the direction of the other mass (a planet, the Sun, whatever).
Affectance flows in and out of all subatomic particles all the time. And the result of that is that all particles “gravitate” or more properly migrate toward the side where the affectance flow is more dense. The center of the particles get shifted over slightly instant by instant. The net result is that objects begin to move toward each other, things fall downward.
yes but if it is a “net” then shouldnt the particles behave as more of a “stretching” rather than a linear translation?
why is it a simple linear translation, a single vector when it is a field that is influencing it? And if affectance “feeds” the animation why is the animation coherent and free of noise and distortion
A “net”???
Who said anything about a net?? 
A"field" as in “a region wherein a property or substance is prevalent”. A “field of grass” has no net. It is merely a region where grass is prevalent.
Affectance was named such because it is both a property and a substance. And it comes as a “field” wherein its property and substance is prevalent.
And what “animation” is “free of noise an distortion”??
When an object moves in a vacuum its atoms do not bounce around and remain exactly the size.
A net is a 2 dimensional field.
If a planet is pulled by two bodies there are 2 vectors of affectance acting on it so why does the planet, not stretch to accomodate both pools of affectance?
The atoms do vibrate unless they are brought to absolute zero temperature. And nothing ever remains perfectly as it was merely an instant earlier.
Thus cannot ever physically exist.
Oh, well it does. Planets heat up merely from their own Moon pulling on them as the Sun also pulls on them. Because everything is turning, the planet gets mushed about like clay. The Earth does less of that due to the water taking up much of the slack.
My visual field is a 2 dimensional field, which exists.
Electricity is the flow of electrons. When electrons flow in closed loops they create a magnetic field. A magnetic field is an effect of relativity: moving electrons shrink in length relative to stationary protons, therefore more electrons are crammed into the same distance/unit compared to protons and thus a charge differential is produced; the “charge” is the fact that particles (protons and electrons) stream out virtual photons from themselves and these photons act like the “ether” you mention in the OP, namely provide a basis for interactions and exchanges that lead to the “magnetic field”.
Stationary magnets (ferromagnetic metals) are no different, because the electrons inside those metals happen to be moving around in closed loops producing little magnetic fields in the same way (in most materials these all cancel out due to atoms and molecules being scattered in the material and not aligned, or aligned in alternating patterns also resulting in fields canceling out.)
Gravity is the curve of “space time” is topography caused by “mass”, mass is as Einstein said the fact that a large amount of energy has been confined to a very small region of space. Time is that aspect of space which is the requirement or “length” to pass through that space, more substance (mass) more “time” as Einstein knew. This is also why light and matter (even light has a tiny little bit of mass) follow “gravity”, because they always seek the path of lease resistance (least “time”).
To your question about why magnetic fields “pass through” other stuff that isn’t magnetic, the field affects (exchanges virtual photons with) every charged particle within it, however if those particles are locked within a molecular bond structure they may not actually respond or move in any noticeable way due to the magnetic field.
A piece of wood is not affected by a magnetic field because despite that the protons and electrons in the wood molecules are affected by the magnetic field, the strength of the molecular bonds in those molecules is greater than the strength of the magnetic field on the individual particles within the molecules.
Hope that helps.
My daemons are currently dormant, I will give you are reply when they are active and I am feeling refreshed enough to properly scrutinize your post.
Actually I should have said that electrons flowing in any direction produce a magnetic field, the flow doesn’t need to be in a closed loop. The shape of the flow of electrons will determine the shape or geometry of the magnetic field.
Wyld
Nice post, but you need to be careful with words like ‘affect’ lol. The premise of ‘affectance ontology’ is that there is a field of affecting particles ~ like a sub em field or maybe background information. The key is in that term ‘affectance’, because it can be thought of as instruction, and thus everything in the universe is being told what to do by it. This is not the same as particles being relative and exchanging values and particles etc. James’s theory/philosophy doesn’t accept relativity, nor QM, particles being in superposition or duplcated etc. To james and ultimate philosophy 1001, the wave-particle duality experiments don’t really show any duality, no probability etc, and its all a bit of a snooker-ball based universe with no scary strangeness.
Please provide evidence of spooky action at a distance. Your last post on the matter was refuted.
I meant “affect” as the typical physical usage of the word, to cause a change, to affect something. In this case here it refers to particles exchanging virtual photons and the momentum of those photons “affects” (changes, impacts, influences) the particle toward which the momentum of the virtual photon is directed. This exchange of momentum is what causes magnetic attraction and repulsion, for example.
I’m not saying anything at all about “affectance ontology” or whatever such nonsense.
Actually, that turns out to be the opposite of the truth. Light always follows the most resistant path.
But the rest of the post, forgiving the use of relativity ontology was accurate.
Actually you exactly quoted Affectance Ontology except for the use of the term “virtual photons”, which really just means “a small amount” (of affectance). I refer to “afflates” (Affectance Oblates) to mean the same thing.
That is your own bullshit. No one has ever said anything about affectance being someone’s “instructions”. 
Affectance is exactly how Wyld described it:
How does light follow the path ofmost resistance if it travels in low density affectance?
Light travels in any affectance density. But if the field is more dense on one side of the little puff, that puff will veer into the more dense region. Note that when light enters water or glass at an angle, it sharply bends into the more dense material. And that goes for the effect of gravity as well. Light turns toward the gravity source, the mass.
no it didn’t it just got evaded ~ as always. now I grow weary so I am going with demonstrable observations proving spooky action at distance. Einstein didn’t realise that being relative meant that all particles are connected for some bizarre reason.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement
Other types of experiments[edit]
In a 2012 experiment, “delayed-choice entanglement swapping” was used to decide whether two particles were entangled or not after they had already been measured.[35]
In a 2013 experiment, entanglement swapping has been used to create entanglement between photons that never coexisted in time, thus demonstrating that “the nonlocality of quantum mechanics, as manifested by entanglement, does not apply only to particles with spacelike separation, but also to particles with timelike [i.e., temporal] separation”.[36] What this means is that two particles can be entangled even if they are distanced from each other in time. Two entangled particles will thus show the property of entanglement even if they are measured in two different times.
In three independent experiments it was shown that classically-communicated separable quantum states can be used to carry entangled states.[37]
In August 2014, researcher Gabriela Barreto Lemos and team were able to “take pictures” of objects using photons that have not interacted with the subjects, but were entangled with photons that did interact with such objects. Lemos, from the University of Vienna, is confident that this new quantum imaging technique could find application where low light imaging is imperative, in fields like biological or medical imaging.[38]
Scientist John Bell designed an experiment to prove quantum entanglement. It involves entangling particles, separating them, moving them off in different directions, and then measuring to see if they maintain that “spooky” connection even while physically separated.
You can watch a detailed explanation of a Bell test in the video below:
techinsider.io/quantum-entan … nt-2015-10
Based on the measurements of 245 pairs of entangled electrons, the team confirmed that each electron really was exerting “spooky action” on its entangled partner; whenever they measured one electron, the other electron across campus instantly flipped.
_
What you don’t understand and will certainly refuse to accept is that what you are quoting about has been no more than a game with your mind. There is absolutely no affect directly between entangled particles. Changing one does not change the other at all.
In QM, when you learn of the state of one, you can then “determine” the state of the other, because they are “entangled”, negative twins. But if you alter one, the other does not alter. There is no cause and effect link between the two.
In Quantum Physics, reality is merely what you know. So when you learn of the state of one particle, you “cause” the knowledge of the other’s state. They translate that as observation of one particle “causes” the state of of one to be what it is. And until the state has been either directly observed or logically determined, the state is all states at the same time (the cat is both dead and alive until observed).