Let's Start World War III! Get ready To Rumble!

Ultimate_Philosophy · February 10, 2016, 1:27pm

Had a dream of this last night. It was in the city near the freeway, lots of cars going around everyone shooting each other. I’m not sure I would want it. There was a lot of sniping action going on, shooting people in real life is more hectic than videogames, it felt like real life in the dream. It seemed like a negative experience to me, couldn’t trust anyone.

When everyone’s a supercriminal, noone is.

Peter_Kropotkin · February 10, 2016, 6:04pm

HaHaHa:

Peter Kropotkin:

spoken like idiots who have no idea what this means.
If you had a clue, you wouldn’t be so excited for WW 3, as
it would mean decades of really ugly living, basically not much
more than stone age living and that, despite childish thinking
that would be fun, would not be fun nor exciting nor very desirable.
It would be ugly for millions of people, to the point where the
living might envy the dead. Life like that is simply survival and
nothing more. No arts, no music, no internet, no TV, no movies.
All that anyone would do is trying to survive, that’s it, that is all
you would be doing and that sports fans is not fun and not exciting.

Kropotkin

It would be terrible for the rest of you.

I’ve already been living an ugly life the last ten years. Nothing new to me.

Even better for me because I won’t have to worry about that pesky thing called law anymore. So many opportunities open up for an individual like myself.

It’s about time the rest of you get to experience genuine suffering, despair, and pain also.

K: ahhh, I get it now. You think you have “SUFFERED” and thus everyone should
“SUFFERER” like you did. You are a narcissistic psychopath who thinks you are
the only person to ever suffer. I have news for you, you aren’t. I was homeless for months
when I was much younger. I have a disability, (severe hearing loss). I am one of millions
who have issues but because I am normal, I don’t wish to have anyone ever suffer needlessly.
I would suggest you see someone about your mental condition. It is serious and needs to
be treated asap.

Kropotkin

Mictlantecuhtli · February 10, 2016, 10:30pm

Peter Kropotkin:

HaHaHa:

Peter Kropotkin:

spoken like idiots who have no idea what this means.
If you had a clue, you wouldn’t be so excited for WW 3, as
it would mean decades of really ugly living, basically not much
more than stone age living and that, despite childish thinking
that would be fun, would not be fun nor exciting nor very desirable.
It would be ugly for millions of people, to the point where the
living might envy the dead. Life like that is simply survival and
nothing more. No arts, no music, no internet, no TV, no movies.
All that anyone would do is trying to survive, that’s it, that is all
you would be doing and that sports fans is not fun and not exciting.

Kropotkin

It would be terrible for the rest of you.

I’ve already been living an ugly life the last ten years. Nothing new to me.

Even better for me because I won’t have to worry about that pesky thing called law anymore. So many opportunities open up for an individual like myself.

It’s about time the rest of you get to experience genuine suffering, despair, and pain also.

K: ahhh, I get it now. You think you have “SUFFERED” and thus everyone should
“SUFFERER” like you did. You are a narcissistic psychopath who thinks you are
the only person to ever suffer. I have news for you, you aren’t. I was homeless for months
when I was much younger. I have a disability, (severe hearing loss). I am one of millions
who have issues but because I am normal, I don’t wish to have anyone ever suffer needlessly.
I would suggest you see someone about your mental condition. It is serious and needs to
be treated asap.

Kropotkin

People like you are not even real human beings to me. You’re a mindless drone. A puppet with strings.

A socially engineered portion of the population to think, act, behave, and live in within parameters instilled by institutional authority. For me if the world catches fire through world war where there are less individuals like yourself all the better.

You know nothing of real suffering or loss. At least not yet…

Mictlantecuhtli · February 10, 2016, 11:22pm

Don’t look now but it looks like the Turks are getting ready to join up with the Saudis in Syria…

Peter_Kropotkin · February 11, 2016, 1:10am

HaHaHa:
People like you are not even real human beings to me. You’re a mindless drone. A puppet with strings.

A socially engineered portion of the population to think, act, behave, and live in within parameters instilled by institutional authority. For me if the world catches fire through world war where there are less individuals like yourself all the better.

You know nothing of real suffering or loss. At least not yet…
[/quote]
K: says the psychopath who needs long term psychology help.

Kropotkin

Mr_Reasonable · February 11, 2016, 7:29am

Joker don’t you hate wall street? Peter, you hate them too right? Talk about that for a minute.

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 2:16pm

I’ve always wanted to go to New York City and snap a photo of me urinating on this bull.

I’ve always wanted to defecate on the front doors of the New York Stock Exchange also.

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 2:21pm

Still, I don’t understand why nobody hasn’t bombed out the New York Stock Exchange while it is in full occupying session.

I don’t understand why nobody hasn’t assassinated a Federal Reserve Chairman yet with a high powered sniper assault rifle.

I don’t understand why nobody hasn’t open fire on a Goldman Sachs bank killing a bunch of its employees with a vice president or CEO involved.

Meno2 · February 11, 2016, 2:25pm

Maybe because they still recall the sad fate of the unibomber!

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 2:26pm

Maybe but really at this point whoever fires the first shot would be providing a real public service.

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 2:31pm

K: says the psychopath who needs long term psychology help.

Kropotkin
[/quote]
Yes, yes, you certainly like calling me a bunch of names.

What I’ve noticed however is that you always stray away from a debate or argument with me.

The reason for this is because you have nothing in your mental arsonal to even compete against me with. You have nothing.

Moreno · February 11, 2016, 2:42pm

You haven’t done this and you seem to have a high estimation of your own abilities.
So you can look at the reasons why you have not done these things and get some good guesses about why others have not.

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 3:35pm

Alas, I would need manpower, military high grade arms, and the financing to pull off such an operation. I unfortunately have none of the above at the moment. If I did however…

I’m just dreaming of individuals with those resources that might pull those things off in my absence.

I mean, there has to be somebody, right?

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 4:40pm

Saudi Arabia Makes “Final” Decision To Send Troops To Syria As US, Russia Spar Over Aleppo Strikes

As you might have heard, the opposition in Syria is in serious trouble.

Last summer, Bashar al-Assad’s army was on the ropes, as the SAA fought a multi-front war against a dizzying array of rebel forces including ISIS. Then Quds commander Qassem Soleimani went to Russia. After that, everything changed.

As of September 30 the Russian air force began flying combat missions from Latakia, rolling back rebel gains and paving the way for a Hezbollah ground offensive. Once Moscow had stopped the bleeding for the SAA (both figuratively and literally), Iran called up Shiite militias from Iraq who, alongside Hassan Nasrallah’s forces, pushed north towards Aleppo.

Now, the city is surrounded and the rebels are cut off from their supply line to Turkey. In short: it’s just a matter of time before the opposition is routed.

So much for President Obama’s “Russia will get itself into a quagmire” line.

The only thing that can save the rebels at this juncture is a direct intervention by the groups’ Sunni benefactors including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Turkey.

That, or an intervention by the US.

Both the Saudis and the Turkey have hinted at ground invasions over the past two weeks and just this morning, a sokesman said Riyadh’s decision to send in troops was “final.”

But direct interventions are tricky. Russia has never denied it intends to bolster Syrian government forces against the rebels, all of whom Moscow deems “terrorists.” On the other hand, Washington, Riyadh, Doha, and Ankara cling to the notion that while they don’t support Assad, they’re primary goal is to fight ISIS. Well ISIS is in Raqqa, which is nowhere near Aleppo, meaning there’s no way to help the rebels out in their fight against the Russians, Iranians, and Hezbollah under the guise of battling Islamic State.

Against that backdrop we found it interesting that Moscow and Washington are now delivering conflicting accounts of airstrikes in Aleppo on Wednesday. The Pentagon, without specifying what time the strikes allegedly took place, says Russia destroyed the city’s two main hospitals.

Defence Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov notes that Warren didn’t provide either hospitals’ coordinates, or the time of the airstrikes, or sources of information. “Absolutely nothing,” he said, describing Warren’s report.

The Kremlin, on the other hand, says US warplanes conducted strikes at 1355 Moscow time. “Two U.S. Air Force A-10 attack aircraft entered Syrian airspace from Turkish territory,” Konashenkov said in a statement. “Reaching Aleppo by the most direct path, they made strikes against objects in the city.”

“Only aviation of the anti-ISIS coalition flew over the city yesterday,” he added.

“When asked on Wednesday whether the U.S.-led coalition could do more to help rebels in Aleppo or improve access for humanitarian aid to the city, Pentagon spokesman Colonel Steve Warren said that the coalition’s focus remained on fighting Islamic State,” Reuters wrote on Thursday. The group is "virtually non-existent in that part of Syria,” Warren said.

Right. Which makes you wonder what two US Air Force A-10 attack planes were doing bombing in and around Aleppo. Is the US set to conduct airstrikes in support of the rebels, thus marking a fresh and exceptionally dangerous escalation of hostilities in the country?

As for what exactly it was that the US warplanes struck, Konashenkov will have to get back to us. He’s too busy winning a war to care right now:

“I’m going to be honest with you: we did not have enough time to clarify what exactly those nine objects bombed out by US planes in Aleppo yesterday were. We will look more carefully."

Below, find excerpts from “Will Russian Victories In Syria Spark A Regional War?” by Yaroslav Trofimov as originally published in WSJ

Defying U.S. predictions of a quagmire in Syria, Russia is achieving strategic victories there with this month’s Aleppo offensive. The question now is whether this is a turning point that hastens the five-year war’s end or the trigger for a counter-escalation that will drag other regional countries into the conflict.

Few expect that Moscow’s main target—the moderate rebels backed by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the U.S.—would now be forced settle the conflict on the Kremlin’s, and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s, terms.

“Their victory in Aleppo is not the end of the war. It’s the beginning of a new war,” said Moncef Marzouki, who served in 2011-14 as the president of Tunisia, the nation that kicked off the Arab Spring, and who recently visited the Turkish-Syrian border. “Now, everybody would intervene.”

To be sure, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have few easy options to counter Russian military might in Syria. But because of national pride—and internal politics—neither can really afford to have the rebel cause in which they have invested so much wiped out by Moscow and its Iranian allies.

While the Obama administration has long been determined to minimize U.S. involvement there, for Turkey and Saudi Arabia the prospect of Syria falling under the sway of Russia and Iran would be a national-security catastrophe.

“The whole situation, not just for Turkey but for the entire Middle East, would be reshaped. The Western influence will fade away. The question is: Can we accept Russia, and the Iranians, calling the tune in the region?” said Umit Pamir, a former Turkish ambassador to NATO and the United Nations.

zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-1 … eppo-strik

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 5:04pm

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 5:07pm

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 5:09pm

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 5:50pm

Iran unofficially tells Saudi Arabia to fuck off in Syria. Epic Shit throwing commences.

Iran Holds Nothing Back: “It’s A Suicide Mission That Will Have A Very Dark End”

Earlier today we reported that Saudi Arabia has made a “final” decision to invade Syria.

Of course they won’t use the term “invade.” They’ll say the same thing the US says, which is that they need to send in a limited number of ground troops to help fight ISIS.

The timing of the announcement quite clearly suggests that the Saudis are going to try and shore up the rebels who are facing imminent defeat at Aleppo where Hezbollah, backed by Russian airstrikes, is about to overrun the opposition.

That outcome is unacceptable for the Saudis, who have been funding and supplying the Sunni opposition in Syria for years. For Turkey, it’s pretty much the same story. How Riyadh and Ankara plan to assist the rebels while maintaining the narrative that they’re only in the country to fight Islamic State is an open question, but one thing is for sure: it’s do or die time. In the most literal sense of the phrase. “Publicly, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain are calling for troops to be deployed as part of the US-led international coalition already ranged against Isis,” FT wrote, earlier this week. “But regional observers say the moves are cover for an intervention to help the Syrian rebels.”

“If Saudi and Turkish forces were deployed at Syria’s northwestern border crossings with Turkey, for example, they would be inside Russia’s operational theatre,” The Times continues. “This would be a total nightmare for the US,” said analyst Aaron Stein, of the Atlantic Council in Washington. “What happens if Russia kills a Turk? They would be killing a Nato member.”

Yes, a “total nightmare” for the US and to let one Iranian military source tell it, a “total nightmare” for the Saudis as well. Read below to see what Tehran thinks about Riyadh’s chances of securing a desirable outcome in Syria (note the reference to Saudi Arabia and Islamic State’s shared ideology):

Via Al-Monitor quoting unnamed Iranian military personnel:

"It’s a joke. We couldn’t wish [for] more than that. If they can do it, then let them do it — but talking militarily, this is not easy for a country already facing defeat in another war, in Yemen, where after almost one year they have failed in achieving any real victory.”

“The Saudis might really take part in this war. Such a decision might come from the rulers of the kingdom without taking into consideration the capabilities of their troops, and here is where the tragedy would occur. They are not well-trained for such terrain. I’m not sure if they sorted out the supply routes they would use — this is assuming that they would only fight [IS] — but it’s obvious they [want to] implement their agenda, after their proxies failed.”

“This would mean a regional war. Mistakes can’t be tolerated, especially with the tension mounting around the region. It’s not about Iranians, but about all troops on the ground fighting with the Syrian army. How would the Syrian army deal with a foreign country on its soil, without its permission, and maybe aiming [guns] at them? That would be an occupation force. Can the Saudis control their army? Who can guarantee that some of them might not defect and join [IS]? They have the same ideology and they hold the same beliefs, and many of them are already connected [to IS].”

“The Saudis are simply putting themselves in a very weird position that might have a very dark end. The worst thing is that the implications aren’t only going to affect the region, but world peace.”

zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-1 … y-dark-end

Meno2 · February 11, 2016, 6:37pm

In a struggle of good over evil, good wins. Christ will soon come back to earth, in the shape of the antichrist, and there will be peace at least for some time. By that time , travel through time will afford the changing of the future by manipulating the past. This is possible now, and we are creating multiple futures now, with loaded indeterminacy. All the indetermination can be pro-programmed, the closer the event becomes technically foreseeable and the program adjusts and re-calculates the most feasible option. (Unless Al turns hostile). The closer uncertainty, the farther the reach of the re-program, by virtue of the gravity of the situation. After that period of tribulation, the Christ will defeat the Antichrist.

Mictlantecuhtli · February 11, 2016, 7:04pm

Hilarious.

Your god is about as real as the Easter Bunny. Sorry, nobody is coming to save you or anybody.

You’re going to be sadly disappointed.

If you’re looking for evil look inside yourself along with the rest of humanity. The real face of the devil if one ever existed to begin with…Good? I assure you there is none.