Prior to a caused event there is its potential. As there can be no first cause, then the first moments of the big bang will denote what its potential were. That potential was in turn denoted by a previous to universe cause.
Such information may only yield what happens between universes or at the very end of the previous one. But having two existences will tell us that reality composes both and yield its third sphere of entity ~ an infinity with an infinite amount of infinite universes in it probably.
There was no Big Bang. The idea of it began as a joke and has never been any more than that. There is more evidence against the BB than for it. And always has been.
Before BB was no space and was no time.
The situation “no space and no time” have only
one reference frame – vacuum. Vacuum has different names:
Minkowski spacetime, negative 2D, Pseudo Euclidian space.
Before BB was “singular point”.
This “singular point” has masses.
Where did these masses come from?
The answer can be only one. These masses came from vacuum.
These masses came from cold zero vacuum. Therefore in the
beginning the “singular point“ wasn’t hot. In the beginning the
“singular point” was cold. Very cold. Zero cold.
Its hard enough to debate these things with existing info, let alone with something which contradicts it.
jerkey
No BB and there simply is no time ~ of the universe duration. So there would have to be infinite time, or otherwise we end up with the same first cause cunundrum.
Secondly, if no BB then knowing this universe would be knowing the universe, without exception.
Bottom line, time is a function of consciousness, without consciousness there is no time. When consciousness grows, the amount of existents grows, and time slows.
When time goes infinitely fast division by zero errors occur, and thus it is said that neither time nor consciousness exists during this phase.
i presented somewhat absolute truths, it doesnt matter if the light barrier is broken. These truths pertain to all worlds with consciousness in the way we understand it. Only reason it would change is if the light barrier created A World Which Is Not A World or a similar realm where absolute truths dont apply.
Supposing ‘consciousness’ is energy, and it too, travels. This may account for some of the ideas that Jung talked about in a volume entitled , ‘synchronicity’. Again an idea, perhaps years away from verification and acceptance. And perhaps the velocity of brain waves exceeds that of the speed of light? Why not? An idea has to be proven wrong, before it can be totally ruled out. If one is to talk about ‘consciousness’ then it would be implausible to dismiss any property assigned to it that does not share similarly, those properties with light.
Consciousness and light have a symbiotic relationship, but that does not disqualify them from being both, forms of energy.
The retina is basically converter, it produces the images, which later turn into ideas, which effect people and things. Is this not the energy that imputes that man in the machine we call consciousness?
The absolute truth is that we know nothing. We swim in a vast enormous ocean of infinite possibilities and what could be or what is… We’re a small dot, of which we have not even finished learning about and of our said dot. So to think we know something of the infinite or “other worlds” is laughable. It’s stimulating to wonder ‘what if’ though.
Socrates has said it already, that we know nothing and recognising this is what makes us wise. We like to think we have come a long way since his time though… But realistically we really haven’t come that far in terms of what we can do and where we can go.