I read Kahneman a couple of months ago. What disturbed me was that he hadn’t developed a theory - hardly a good description - to define the types 1 and 2. You have to learn them by his analyses of examples. To understand them you might need cognitive psychology.
Well, anyway, I kind of eat this stuff up and i know that I will learn from it. Anything which has to do with the mind fascinates me - leaves us open to more reflection and speculation and understanding of self.
On a scale of 1 to 10, how disturbed were you?
So, are you saying that you did not go along with him and his views?
.
But that I think is good. Analogies and examples are a great way to learn things - because of what we do know already, we are better able to understand.
Yummy. Might you say that it could open up the doors of one’s mind to understanding more of cognitive psychology?
No, on the contrary. I agree with his ideas completely.
Think of an explorer who had found a new land. He describes its nature, people, social organizations, etc, so well that you can easily imagine what it would be like to live there. But he don’t tell where it is, what are its neighbours or how you could get there. You cannot associate it with your present worldview; sooner or later you’ll forget it as any useless information.
That’s what disturbed me. Kahneman’s views are too remarkable to be left forgotten. I won’t forget them; I have made associations my way, but I would have liked to know more about his, just to get a firmer ground under my feet.
[size=150]Will in the World[/size]
How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare
Stephen Greenblatt
Greenblatt knows more about [Shakespeare] than Ben Jonson or the Dark Lady did."―John Leonard, ?Harper’s
A young man from a small provincial town moves to London in the late 1580s and, in a remarkably short time, becomes the greatest playwright not of his age alone but of all time. How is an achievement of this magnitude to be explained? How did Shakespeare become Shakespeare? Stephen Greenblatt brings us down to earth to see, hear, and feel how an acutely sensitive and talented boy, surrounded by the rich tapestry of Elizabethan life, could have become the world’s greatest playwright. ?A Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award Finalist.
I am cursed in that I despise reading. I will begin and then stop and then do it on my own. So I started writing my own ORM.
Which is definitively not a good idea because I’m not going to be able to learn enough for the exam. So what do I do? I stop writing my ORM and stop reading the book. I do nothing and simply wait for the last moment. Then I do everything and, strangely, things always work out fine.
ORM is mapping objects, which are hierarchical, onto tables, which are relational. Objects is how OOP programs store their data in working memory, tables is how relational databases store them. Here, RDB’s are used for persistence, though I have no clue why, why would anyone use relational databases to persist object-based data.
You know what kind of technology we need? We need a tech which will allow us to pull certain parts of our brains out of our brains and plug them into a robot which will use the knowledge and skills contained in these parts. This will be very useful for people like me, for example. I know everything about computer programming but I cannot for life of me sit down and program. So what does this mean? It means I have plenty of skills and knowledge which I’ll never manage to use in a useful way, like make money out of it, monetize it. Now with the aforementioned tech I could “castrate” these parts dealing with computer programming from my mind and then “sell” them or “rent” them to those who need someone who will do the coding for them. Everyone wins! So this is what Trixie should be working on . . .
Some people can’t bear solitude, let alone the idea that the heavens are empty and that we do not even succeed in troubling their deafness with our bootless cries. To be an exile or outcast on a remote shore – many minds turn away in terror and seek any source of cosiness. – Christopher Hitchens
A ceiling fan assembly instruction manual. Never in my life have I ever had so much trouble hanging a ceiling fan. This thing has got me pulling my hair out, but I ain’t gonna let it whoop me. I can do this…you have to be smarter than the fan, see. So I’m gonna take a deep breath and read the instructions. Then I’m gonna send an email to the manufacturer and give them a piece of my mind. You should NEVER have to read instructions for one of these things. This is a design flaw.
Ah. I didn’t put the rubber gasket on before I screwed in the blade plate… so the screws were too long. By adding the gasket, the plate becomes wider, and the screws don’t hit the mount before they tighten the plate. See I thought the gasket was optional. I’ve never put them on before and the fan mounted just fine. These assholes have to design their ceiling fans differently and make it all complicated.
Next week I’ll post pics of this screened-in porch we just built…or should I say ‘I’ because David did only twenty percent of the work, and badly at that. Show you people what happens when you give Zoot some good tools and a lumber package.