Again, I’m responding to the charge of being a troll in the “love” thread as well, and demonstrating a pattern of behavior by Phon. My comment about he Big Bang Theory, is that the joke that goes over the women’s heads is that all the guys in that show had to be assholes to get women, but they are portrayed as the “nice guys” who can’t get laid… this is the code used in that show that goes over women’s heads. So actually when the topic was romantic love, I was factually answering the question, I was not shitting on the thread.
Yeah, by speaking the truth to topics. Go figure.
Durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr durr…
I’m also not a politician or academic, and I don’t have the reputations of academics to worry about because I figured this all out by logic, not from books… so I’m not as socially conscious or coded as others are. I just speak the plain truth about this subject, because I own it myself. Academics tend to know each other by how they write on message boards, and depending on the message board, you have the social and financial elite and politicians too.
And you called me a troll? I’m explaining message board politics… and I’m explaining how people use the word troll to silence people when denial systems are involved. It’s actually extremely hard to prove someone by definition is a troll because part of the definition requires intent, and a lack of earnestness about the subject. You are clearly ignorant about what a troll is Phon.
Phon, you’re only accusing me of speaking but not saying anything but gibberish. Can you prove it? Again, calling someone a troll without proving it is being a troll. That’s one of the ways you can actually PROVE someone is a troll.
Oh, and another way you can prove someone is a troll is by seeing whether they respond directly to the person, or try to use language to go over their heads. Since you’ve done both, you actually, by definition are a troll.
Don’t say i didn’t warn you Phon… I just gave you the search algorithms to find and define a troll… I wasn’t sure yet, until you posted that pic in the last thread and this video, now I know for a fact that you’re a troll. I tried to warn you that you were venomous relative to others… I thought that might change your behavior. This is not an issue of free speech, this is about how people behave in the context of speaking… You can’t murder anyone because of free speech, and on the net you can’t troll and call it free speech.
I am not going to get sucked into discussion with you again.
Actually, you just did with this reply. That’s the part where I was saying in the last thread, that you’re not logical QED… though i gleaned it from other interactions with you as well. Unlike you, I pay close attention to evidence, as Staitktech can attest, he showed me evidence and I said, “Thank you for showing me that” “I can’t prove my argument because of this evidence”
Joking aside, carleas or whoever may concern, the thread ecmandu posted itself is evidence that I replied to every asinine proposal by ecmandu with a serious answer, to the point where he couldn’t sustain his proposals and just shifted the discussion into another asinine argument, at which point I quit. I would have done better to follow my own directive from page one or two and quit the conversation as soon as he joined, as that would have saved me a lot of typing, but I must have been bored 
I’m just going to go ahead and do that for now, and recommend all to do the same.
I do want to point out, though, he is ruining a lot of threads that would otherwise be productive. Something to observe.
And that is all I have to say about this. Tchau!
Actually, the person who ended the debate was statiktech, who never lost his temper and didn’t end his posts calling me names, and actually addressed the point i was making. You on the other hand as i said in that thread, were and are venomous, and this is not a good way to conduct yourself… just look at the difference between you and statiktech in that thread, actually you and everyone.
So Freud was right after all? Lol analysis is alive and well! We just can no longer afford it, out of the sense of the mundane. It’s so old, and worn, and ultimately soooooooooo politically left. Right. Even the good old boys’ club has been infiltrated with traitors. Most codes are broken. I wonder what Contra Nietzche may add to this if he was around?
Course there are codes within codes within, well…
Reasonable, Your much too kind, but at times codes need to be broken, and that’s an impossible way to set any prescribed set of rules, even within the cover of irony, especially when it is not at all opaque.
Freud was right, both about psychoanalysis and that the animus defined basically everything, but a lot more has been discovered since Freud and his language and even some of his concepts are antiquated. Yes, the transparent irony of calling someone a troll when that actually makes you a troll was lost on Phon.
Ecm, saying something isn’t logical is kind of a misstatement. Everything is bound by logic. So you don’t say things are illogical. Instead you ask, “what is the logic of this thing?”
Sure but there are many types of logic. The logic of a troll is to get attention at the expense of logic, which kinda creates a paradox, or at least a different order of logic.
Just read your own sentence there again. You’re equivocating the term “logic” and you’re cyber bullying a troll.
=) Trolls are cyber-bullies by definition. That’s like saying a police officer who arrests a murderer is a bully.
.