It cannot be Europe, conceivably , since Europe is now unified. Civil war, may not occur in a union which is patterned after the USA, because the presedent cause of civil war in the U.S. has, for all practical purposes laid the groundwork for the causes, therewith. I do not think, in the event of a call for disunion, or secession, that political means be not found.
Not all but, most. Civil development, from such horror and pain a social memory develops which often improves that society. What is the oldest known surviving society?
If you agree to the statement that the “societies” of the Stone Age can be called “societies”, then I say that the oldest “surviving societies” are those who lived in the Stone Age. But I guess you mean the later societies. Before I answer your question in that way, I have to know what you exactly mean by “surviving societiy”. Do you mean a unit of culture or a nation? Nation would be difficult because it is only an occidental, a modern occidental concept.
Of course some Eastern-European country that probably doesn’t exist yet will attack some other Eastern-European country that doesn’t exist yet, sometime in the next 35 years. They hardly ever stop.
Civil war is only productice in that it absorbs the hostility within borders and does not extend it outside of it. I am fairly surer, that international causes co conflict, causing intra national strife between groups n general grounds, will most certainly directed at ‘outside’ sources of intrusive agitation. This has usually been the case, with prior wars, eneemies were found outside, so as to releive the pressure from internal resposnible authority. This is i voted no, because like in the present conflict, for example Germany’s heavily populated Arab extreme groups, those people will certainly be exyended to such groups’ original pre emigration places of origin. Just like in the US, after the Pearl Harbor attack, Japanese Americans were interned into camps to contain their suspected agression due to perceived divided loyalties.
“Germany’s heavily populated Arab extreme groups”? Okay, there are also some in Germany, but most of them are in France, Belgium, Netherland, and of course England.
You can call it “West Eurpoe’s heavily Arab extreme groups”. Maybe that in the future some European countries will have more heavily Arab extreme groups than the current European countries I mentioned. This thread is about war in the future of Europe till 2050.
Maybe Europe should approach Russia. I am not sure, but what do you think about that?
Well, that might be a small part of the aborigines in Australia. No where else.
All, or majority of societies evolve, change or fail. The common binding element is not peace but, struggle. Comfort breeds or bred most downfalls one way or another, internal or external.
No, Obe. That’s not right. The largest Arab population has France. That is right.
And b.t.w.: If we talk about the danger of war, which is the theme in this thread, then we have to consider the Arab or Islamic population per head. Per head!
And small parts in Amazonia, Central Africa, Papua New Guinea; and due to the fact that they are small parts, the probability that they will survive is even higher.
If their jungles will not completely be cut down, then they will probably have the best chances to survive the global holocaust.
Okay, let’s go back to the title of this thread: Will there be war in Europe before 2050? We are talking about the following area (especially the green coloured one):