Unbearable Ambition

I will try to steer for comprehensible substance - tell me if this is lacking in clarity and if so where specifically, or otherwise what specifically you need to know to begin.

The only objectifying test of astrology is an empirical one.
One test is for someone to give me a number of points in time and space on Earth one of which is their birth, and the astrologer tries to pick out the right chart based on what he perceives of the person.

Another is for the astrology to outright say the sun is here moon there, ascendant this and probably A in the xth house, B in y, etc.

I can not sustain a success rate in the later, because I don’t try for one. But this is what a professional astrologer had to be able to do when the art was taken seriously. It is still taken seriously, but it is being obscured by printing horoscopes based on the isolated position of the sun, which is virtually certain to be irrelevant or incorrect, given that aspects determine everything. But everything. There is nothing that is not explicit in a chart or a progressed chart. And with explicit I mean explicit: exact conjunctions at momentous events are ubiquitous. Probability is not even a factor. It is more like gravity. The only restriction to it is that the human life is beyond comprehension - not that its set of strengths and weaknesses and course of obstacles is not absolutely determined. The interplay between many such determined paths through the human density of transience, causes the courses of fate (2) versus destiny (1), a choice which is determined at - only, it looks like - angular portals of intensification or multiplication.

We are always under the influence, first of the sun and our own orbit(ascendant), then moon (semi-retrograding, ‘slipping’ moon points are crucial to avoid error in magic (shortcutting relations by invoking numerical and qualitative patterns of propagation)) - and then of the planets. I can not account for their force except on a level of deep subtlety; as I said we are all of us on Earth embedded not only on Earth but in the flat plane of the Suns outposts, and this whole is blanked covered by the scintillating intelligence of the magnetic fields, propagating their ‘logics’ in gods knows what complexities but all of our brains are directly embedded in this system, in some fields more even than they are ‘stuck on our spines’. A brain can keep functioning without a body, and still be uninfluenced by its location on Earth, by the position of the Sun, but also by the moons phase and proximity to the Earth, which causes the tides but also correlates with increases and decreases of conceptions and murders and pull at the waters in our body and brain. The moon is primarily connected to the body and the mother, as it influences the waters and the bleeding. We are not isolated from our system. We can of course live in bunkers; it is likely that to be born and conceived in a bunker means to be born more ‘neutrally’, whatever that means; more in terms of genes perhaps, with less character of ones own. More in terms of the times, the architecture of the bunker, the clothes -
to be born under the stars then means to be delivered free to oneself.

A third is a reading of a chart without knowledge of the person it applies to.

A fourth test is semi empirical, it is a reading done of the person with the chart next to him. This is what is by far the most common and easy and unfalsifiable and what makes the image of astrology. If I had a the money to hire some programmers and advertising space I could make dating site whose worth would run in the billions because it has an unsurpassed success rate. I have a lot of date, gathered by specialist friend, of the type of alignments that are consistent in lasting romantic bonds. The consistencies are strong enough to make marketable predictions; if out of a pool of 500 there are 48-51 men with moon on the woman’s Juno, there are also 48-51 women with moon on the mans Juno. So genders relations to planets are interchangeable, but planetary relations are not. It is the coherence of patterns Every body is a step in the pattern. Ever alignment is a shared step, a resonance of will and identity.

Astrology by numbers -

1 and 8 are related to drive
2 and 7 are related to value
3 and 6 are related to intelligence
4 and 5 are related to identity
9 is related to law and expansion
10 is related to structural drive, will to power
11 related to universal value, knowledge,
12 is related to completion, ‘divine love’ as well as ‘self-undoing’.

12 as 4 times 3 is the only thing that properly comes after the nine (thus not 10 or 11), as 369 is enclosed in itself but becomes ‘matter’ when it steps out of itself into a fourth step, a dimension outside of itself, the stability and of the square or the tetrahedron, the ‘house’. But in the house the self is undone, the core chain is broken.

10 and 11 are states of suspension before either expansion or collapse. They are therefore regarded as signs of mystery and independence.

Is there any way you can apply this to, say, our mathematical design?

That said - all numbers are found in you depending on which “universal powers” you focus on, correct? It would make sense because I have it all.

That information on the moon affecting water and bleeding was something I was thinking about off an on.

I also suggest to explain the moon moving away - it’s because it will reach a point where it stops moving backwards and start moving forwards - ad infinitum.

Remember, this entire planet is perpetuating via sea and land. What is sea will be land and what is land will be sea later.

:character-spamcan:

Sorry to hear that. I enjoyed the conversation and found you worthwhile discussing with, which is not at all common on the internet.

Jakob, as a genius you over think things.

Please stop letting fear tactics consume you. The government already does what James did (as unruly and pathetic as he is) and more. It’s not like James did anything the government isn’t doing right now with our information from company to company.

Get over here and stop letting fear degrade your future. The only things that can blur your vision is damage to your sight and yourself - are you going to seriously let this consume you? James is nothing - will always be nothing - ignore the faceless figure and get back to making your future. Don’t let someone’s sociopathy get to you - that’s how you feed them. I already told that kid that he was a vulture and a vampire that feeds on the life of others - we all know what kind of inhumane creature they are for preying on people to compensate for their irritable lifestyle. Whether you like it or not, James isn’t the only fucked up creature in this world - most of this species are fucked up; always judging real people based on facetious media outlets and incomplete data. It’s a sick world out there - James is just a byproduct of that sick world.

Don’t you get the psychology behind it? James is targeting you because YOU are a threat to HIM. He targets you because he envies you. He tries to feed off of you because it’s a twisted version of love. I’m not even kidding when I say this - love is commonly twisted into unrecognizable states - this is one of them. James gives you attention in a twisted way like the boy gives the girl attention. When you run away, you are then creating an enemy - when you stand, you create envy.

Do you understand? You’re Jon Stewart/Steven Colbert - James is Bill O’ Reilly/Bill O’ Reilly.

I understand that James makes you see him like this (removing the word “hunter” & “sexual”, of course):

But James is more like this:

Land of David by Jakob M.

That is probably the bravest gesture of exposing your “heart”.

It certainly touched mine.

Beautifully done, perhaps that is your unbearable ambition.

The heart, the jewel, the essence of who we are.

“We should not pretend to understand the world only by the intellect; we apprehend it just as much by feeling. Therefore, the judgment of the intellect is, at best, only the half of truth, and must,
if it be honest, also come to an understanding of its inadequacy”.

Thanks for the comments, I overreacted or rather, reacted in the wrong way. HMIE, youre depictions are quite clarifying. Indeed the first image is somehow related to how I perceived James. I can not deny a great deal of naivite about peoples strengths and weaknesses - I tend to, when I perceive a strength that pleases, model a whole character around that strength, ofen largely imaginary. I am the opposite of someone who preys on weaknesses - I prefer not to even notice them, as I dont want to tip toe around them as little as I want to make use of them.

In any case it would clearly not be wise for me to leave now, as James is clearly stimulated by his mild warning to spam the board with more lies about me. So be it, he’ll just be my pet-troll from now, I’ll keep an eye on him while our vessel of music spirals toward the cosmic heart.

You are most welcome, brother.

When I cure cancer, I will also cure hate, fear and viruses. They are all mathematically based on the same fundamental principles of the Universe. This includes the human embodiment of such, which is what consumes James right now.

Let the cancer know it’s cancer - never give it a moment to pretend it’s human enough.

That is the best advice I can give you to restore life to the dead that don’t know they’re dead.

[111111]

And part of the ambition is to expand the scope of this method without diluting its criteria.
This can only be done by seeing into the inner logic of logic itself. What makes it possible for two different instances to both relate and still remain different.

All philosophers want power, because philosophy wants to remake the world in the image of its ideal.

However, to attain a two thousand year reach, isn’t difficult if your ideas are fertile enough. Plato, Socrates, Nietzsche, and Christ all started with a very small circle of allies and readers.

This is the problem. You need an end-goal. And your motivations must be noble, like excalibur. A symbiosis, if you give lifeforms what they need they will in turn give you what you need.

One of my goals is to restore sanity to the human species, I am so sick of YOLO font, modern pop music and the incorrigible attitudes of the millenials.

That’s true, but mutual inclusivity in an absolute sense, seems to imply a similar state, and it is This absolute which in my opinion can result in an enlightened psychic.

The powers in an absolute inclusivity come.about, not as a non-reactive, borne in original state, but through a re-integration of prior separates elements. The conclusive state of mind is letting go of any further positioning of the will to power, in specific modalities with specific goals.

The result is the sought after freedom of letting go of ultranpersonal drives to specific desires of thought or action.

Aurelius said.that an untested virtue has no valuable meritorious effect.

This is again on point.
Really like you when you aren’t emotionally violent. I appreciate it, given I know the challenge.

Let me clarify: my power as I felt it then - and as I still feel it - wishes to set goals, but my mind couldn’t yet conceive of a goal great enough to satisfy my will - especially give that the attainment of a goal is always a moment of sadness, as it makes further striving impossible, and true joy for a man is only in striving. But these 6 years a lot has been crystallizing, and there are now goals whose attainment doesn’t dissolve them.

In a rudimentary sense, a philosophers location is tied into such goals. The re-attainment of it (after 2300 years) would only signify a beginning.

Yes, this state however needs to be carved out, by first following many specific wills to their final consequence, or to the point where they begin to run against ones tastes. Which is really a final consequence, a no.

Still, yes.

I kind of hate Aurelius - he was sitting there proclaiming moderation on the millions of skulls gathered by his immensely cruel predecessors.

If attaining a goal is sad, then I say cry beautiful tears. I too have felt this feeling, once the mountain is reached, what then is there to do? Simply relax and enjoy the view. Masculinity is a striving for goals, it exists as a result of some feminine desire.

Ultimately, yes. But there are different types of goals. Imagine a goal that is itself a bringing of a new goal-setting; extreme example, space travel. The first man in space represented both the attainment of a goal, and the opening up of a vast new field aims and desires. That is the type of goal on which I have become focussed.

I agree that this means the inserting or recognizing of a feminine element in the willing, and that this has been underwriting the masculine willing all along - it is when the man has reached a certain weariness with his incessant goal-attaining that he can admit to some enjoyment. It is a matter of worthiness - only when he is tired does a man know for certain that he might have done something.

A simpler way of saying this is that at the end of some real work he is too tired to question himself.

Aristocracies are really a culture of perpetual languidness, endless getting-ready to do the dreadful thing itself, which then becomes a reward of those preparations. I think women are more and more taking over this roll. In Nietzschean tastes, they need to transform from ever-tense tigers to lionesses.