Moderator: MagsJ
Jakob wrote:"No, not." "No, not really." "Not, no."
these are phrases that come to mind.
Hitler had 5 of those in his natal chart, neatly arranged.
Yes. I think we should have a tree house.
Jakob wrote:Sorry -I was wondering how confusing it was, but I never feel the tendency to clear it up. I am Fixed Cross.
Jakob wrote:To share fully what I have learned as being tradition but do not understand -
11, 22, 33 are counted as semi-irreducible - as exalted versions of 2, 4 and 6; this would have to account for the justification of the decimal system. That this system is not completely arbitrary can be grasped from the magic number of five in two: 144.
Jakob wrote:Sorry -I was wondering how confusing it was, but I never feel the tendency to clear it up. I am Fixed Cross.
Jakob wrote:I invented this self-valuing logic, and drew up that 9 matrix, though of course that's not my contribution to life in any sense [...] The idea of putting it together came to me in my sleep once.
HatingMeIsEasier wrote:Jakob wrote:"No, not." "No, not really." "Not, no."
these are phrases that come to mind.
What comes to mind for me is "MACHINES".
Hitler had 5 of those in his natal chart, neatly arranged.
Are you saying what I think you're saying?
Yes. I think we should have a tree house.
Let's call it the "Big O' Tree" house. That's a double entendre. It will be home for us and ironic hell for bigots.
The Artful Pauper wrote:Jakob wrote:Sorry -I was wondering how confusing it was, but I never feel the tendency to clear it up. I am Fixed Cross.
I wasn't aware you were Fixed Cross, you've made some very good posts on this forum
Thanks for the discussion, I'm going to take some time to let it sink in.Jakob wrote:I invented this self-valuing logic, and drew up that 9 matrix, though of course that's not my contribution to life in any sense [...] The idea of putting it together came to me in my sleep once.
I look forward to reading more of your posts here and through the links you directed me to earlier.
Jakob wrote:Yes, the level of transience of or our states - and thus the subtlety of our selfvaluing overall control determines the degree of our our human genius, our 'freedom from determinism' - the degree to which our consciousness includes (differentiates and activates) the possibilities that cause its movements. Selfcontrol means stabilized futurality, means 'faith' in the sense of knowing ones paradigm of potential, mind being not just morally committed but carnally wedded to reality.
I am not sure; in any case I am saying I am an astrologer, and that Hitler was a magician - in the sense of a phenomenon driven by short-cut ties to and between different causal logics operating on us through the system in which Earth is embedded. The system is highly electrical. Subtle cross-referential spectral resonance shifts are pervasive in the electricity of our brains. I am sure half of my readers will drop me. And this is indeed a matter that is more comfortably discussed behind closed doors. But I find it important to make it known that to my mind the astrological logics are wholly derived from geometrical properties of the relations between the primordial numbers; 2, 3, 4 and 6 figure into the building of the 12-fold Zodiac, where the permutations of of 3- and 4-foldness form the backbone of the typology. The central cardinalities are the two horizons on the path of the earths rotation; both around the sun ("signs" - segments, not constellations) and around its axis ("houses"), and the intersections of the suns ecliptic with the zenith meridian, nadir and midheaven (corresponding in the greater wheel to 0 Cancer and 0 Capricorn). The Vedic system orients not on geometrical points but on constellations; it is thus each 60 years one degree further off from the western system on which it appears to founded by the fact that the difference is now something like 27 degrees, which means that the split must have occurred less than two millennia ago, at which point the Vedic philosophy was already dying. And indeed astrology makes a lot more sense if its coordinates are based on physical angles and proximities, rather than on endless depths of endlessly differentiated radiation from indeterminate 'constellations', relying on a model rather lacking in dimensionality.
Jakob wrote:Based on 0? Not sure what you mean, but:
1 Aries, cardinal fire, initiative, expansion (primary)
8 Scorpio, fixed water, containment, perseverance (secondary)
Astrology is based on the angles between the planets from the birth perspective, when the electrical system of the organism is separated from its mother's.
These angles produce a system called harmonics, where 360 is 1. Of these harmonics the 1, 2, 3 and 4 are enough to create the 12 fold system of cardinalities and elements. Elements pertain to expansion and contraction, phases of density, Water is the final, perfected contained element, fire the first, expansive and self-generating. Mutable fire, 9 Sagittarius, is consuming and dispersing across the board.
The principle is two fold - self-valuing (cardinal-fixed) and valuing (fixed-mutable).
Al this is speculative -
I know astrology primarily as a collection of empirical data. All information (sun in aquarius = blah blah) is useless, all charts must be read whole. This means integrating the geometry into an overall pattern.
But the geometry extends to a system of qualities, which is not reducible to numbers without knowing fully the complete chemical structures of the planets and the Sun - it is easier to atomically deconstruct a brain to achieve the same ends. Order is humanly reducible to principle, but quality is not; therefore all human attempts to this end bring about a reduction of the human quality.
Jakob wrote:Astrology by numbers -
1 and 8 are related to drive
2 and 7 are related to value
3 and 6 are related to intelligence
4 and 5 are related to identity
9 is related to law and expansion
10 is related to structural drive, will to power
11 related to universal value, knowledge,
12 is related to completion, 'divine love' as well as 'self-undoing'.
12 as 4 times 3 is the only thing that properly comes after the nine (thus not 10 or 11), as 369 is enclosed in itself but becomes 'matter' when it steps out of itself into a fourth step, a dimension outside of itself, the stability and of the square or the tetrahedron, the 'house'. But in the house the self is undone, the core chain is broken.
10 and 11 are states of suspension before either expansion or collapse. They are therefore regarded as signs of mystery and independence.
Jakob wrote:Because I no longer responded to his insults, provocations and sneaky threats, he decided to reveal my identity. I don't feel like staying here any longer under these unsafe conditions; I'll move to different forums and different media on the internet.
Jakob wrote:For now I have been driven away here by James S Saint, who is apparently some sort of cyberterrorist - I've heard some ghastly stories about him, but only started realizing the possible truth of them quite recently.
Because I no longer responded to his insults, provocations and sneaky threats, he decided to reveal my identity. I don't feel like staying here any longer under these unsafe conditions; I'll move to different forums and different media on the internet.
It has been revealed so I might as well announce it: my full name is Jakob Milikowski, I am an artist and philosopher, and have been safely making use of internet anonymity for 14 years. That is over now - perhaps for the best.
I wish all of you good luck with the sociopathic or professional saboteur JamesSSaint /"Sanjay" - - my advise to everyone is just to 'add to foe list' and never reveal anything personal to him in PM's.
That's all I suppose - thanks to a lot of you for very many bright ideas.
Take care,
Jakob / Fixed Cross
Jakob wrote:Thanks for the comments, I overreacted or rather, reacted in the wrong way. HMIE, youre depictions are quite clarifying. Indeed the first image is somehow related to how I perceived James. I can not deny a great deal of naivite about peoples strengths and weaknesses - I tend to, when I perceive a strength that pleases, model a whole character around that strength, ofen largely imaginary. I am the opposite of someone who preys on weaknesses - I prefer not to even notice them, as I dont want to tip toe around them as little as I want to make use of them.
In any case it would clearly not be wise for me to leave now, as James is clearly stimulated by his mild warning to spam the board with more lies about me. So be it, he'll just be my pet-troll from now, I'll keep an eye on him while our vessel of music spirals toward the cosmic heart.
MechanicalMonster wrote:Science is simply one kind of understanding produced by the application of a certain kind of method.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users