Things are considered good or bad to subjective individuals. Even then judgements can change over time, so there is no stable good or bad. To project those categories onto others is useless, except maybe as part of our own understanding of the world (“I think that action, thing, or person is bad, so I want to avoid them” (or some other action/relation, eg. eradicate)). But not as part of a scheme of objective understanding (but subjective understanding).
I understand what you’re saying here, but I don’t agree — not because I think those things are necessary, but because it is human nature that even if you got rid of all those things there would be people striving with all their might to force themselves upon you, try to control or enslave you. Consider that at one point in early human history there was no government or law, these things developed naturally due to human nature (ie. conquerors).
Besides that, natural circumstances (environment, the physical makeup of the human body, capactiy, etc.) will also limit our freedom in a certain way.
This is why I recommend practical virtues, not as any kind of moral obligation, but like useful tools that if understood can be practiced to effect. I am thinking of things like courage, foresight, endurance, prudence, cautiousness. Combine this with knowledge of nature (physis) and current convention — and it will help you navigate the world.